Literature DB >> 11274072

Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability.

S Hong1, J Narkiewicz, R H Kardon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity and variability of pupil perimetry with visual perimetry at the same retinal locations in normal subjects.
METHODS: Pupil perimetry was performed on the right and left eyes of 10 normal subjects using a computerized infrared pupillometer equipped to present perimetric light stimuli and record pupil light reflexes. Eleven locations were tested at different intensities along the horizontal meridian of each eye, and the decibel sensitivity of the pupil light reflex was compared with the visual threshold at the same location.
RESULTS: The shape and height of the hill of vision (retinal sensitivity) was very similar between the right and left eyes of each individual using either pupil perimetry (R2 = 0.69) or standard threshold perimetry (R2 = 0.62) but was less similar between subjects. Comparisons between pupil and visual sensitivity revealed a lack of correlation at the same retinal location in normal eyes (R2 = 0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: The high intereye correlation for either pupil or visual sensitivity may provide an important tool for detecting focal or asymmetric visual field damage. Although the basic shape of the sensitivity profile of pupil and visual responses was similar under the conditions of testing, the two did not correlate well within each eye among the normal subjects. This highlights that similarities do exist in the sensitivity profile of the two pathways, but they do not seem to vary in the same proportion between normal individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11274072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  10 in total

1.  Pupillary evaluation of retinal asymmetry: development and initial testing of a technique.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Harry J Wyatt; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Pupil campimetry in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and functional visual field loss.

Authors:  Karolína Skorkovská; Holger Lüdtke; Helmut Wilhelm; Barbara Wilhelm
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  What rates of glaucoma progression are clinically significant?

Authors:  Luke J Saunders; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-13

4.  Multifocal pupillography identifies retinal dysfunction in early age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Andrew C James; Rohan W Essex; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Anisotropy in the peripheral visual field based on pupil response to the glare illusion.

Authors:  Novera Istiqomah; Yuta Suzuki; Yuya Kinzuka; Tetsuto Minami; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-26

6.  New approach for the glaucoma detection with pupil perimetry.

Authors:  Ken Asakawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-21

7.  Rapid pupil-based assessment of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Harry J Wyatt; William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  In vivo functional imaging of intrinsic scattering changes in the human retina with high-speed ultrahigh resolution OCT.

Authors:  V J Srinivasan; Y Chen; J S Duker; J G Fujimoto
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Pupil perimetry in the diagnosis of functional visual field loss.

Authors:  M S Rajan; F D Bremner; P Riordan-Eva
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Gaze-Contingent Flicker Pupil Perimetry Detects Scotomas in Patients With Cerebral Visual Impairments or Glaucoma.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Carlien Roelofzen; Alessio Fracasso; Douwe P Bergsma; Mies van Genderen; Giorgio L Porro; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.