Literature DB >> 11273878

The case for daily dialysis: its impact on costs and quality of life.

P E Mohr1, P J Neumann, S J Franco, J Marainen, R Lockridge, G Ting.   

Abstract

Research suggests daily hemodialysis may improve clinical outcomes. To date, a comprehensive review of its implications on quality of life has not been performed, and little is known about its economic impact. We conducted an economic evaluation comparing short daily or nocturnal hemodialysis with thrice-weekly conventional in-center dialysis. Data on the quality of life and clinical effects of daily dialysis were obtained from more than 60 reports from 13 daily dialysis programs around the world (n = 197). Cost data were derived principally from the US Renal Data System, Centers for Disease Control, and Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Resource use during daily hemodialysis was modeled after two ongoing programs in the United States. Results suggest that patients feel better and direct treatment costs could be reduced with daily dialysis. Costs are sensitive to assumptions about the effect of daily dialysis on hospital days. Reductions of at least 8% in hospital days are required for these modalities to be cost saving compared with documented reductions of 30% to 100%. Larger well-controlled studies of daily versus conventional dialysis would be helpful to determine whether daily dialysis fulfills these promises. Medicare policy, which limits payment for most patients to three dialysis treatments weekly, poses a disincentive to more widespread adoption among dialysis centers. Given this constraint to broader acceptance, we address several policy options to gain a better understanding of the potential risks and benefits of daily dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11273878     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(01)80127-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  24 in total

1.  Utilization and outcome of 'out-of-center hemodialysis' in the United States: a contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer M MacRae; Caren L Rose; Bertrand L Jaber; John S Gill
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2010-05-21

2.  Estimating patient-borne water and electricity costs in home hemodialysis: a simulation.

Authors:  Matthew Nickel; Wes Rideout; Nikhil Shah; Frances Reintjes; Justin Z Chen; Robert Burrell; Robert P Pauly
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 3.  A review of the costs and cost effectiveness of interventions in chronic kidney disease: implications for policy.

Authors:  Joseph Menzin; Lisa M Lines; Daniel E Weiner; Peter J Neumann; Christine Nichols; Lauren Rodriguez; Irene Agodoa; Tracy Mayne
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies.

Authors:  Scott W Klarenbach; Marcello Tonelli; Betty Chui; Braden J Manns
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  Intensive home haemodialysis: benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Karthik K Tennankore; Christopher T Chan; Simon P Curran
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Treatment of depression and poor mental health among patients receiving maintenance dialysis: are there options other than a pill or a couch?

Authors:  Michael J Fischer; Anna C Porter; James P Lash
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Economic evaluation of frequent home nocturnal hemodialysis based on a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Scott Klarenbach; Marcello Tonelli; Robert Pauly; Michael Walsh; Bruce Culleton; Helen So; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Braden Manns
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Technical breakthroughs in the wearable artificial kidney (WAK).

Authors:  Victor Gura; Alexandra S Macy; Masoud Beizai; Carlos Ezon; Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Survival and hospitalization among patients using nocturnal and short daily compared to conventional hemodialysis: a USRDS study.

Authors:  Kirsten L Johansen; Rebecca Zhang; Yijian Huang; Shu-Cheng Chen; Christopher R Blagg; Alexander S Goldfarb-Rumyantzev; Chistopher D Hoy; Robert S Lockridge; Brent W Miller; Paul W Eggers; Nancy G Kutner
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 10.  Intensified hemodialysis regimens: neglected treatment options for children and adolescents.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Miriam Zimmering; Christopher T Chan; Philip A McFarlane; Andreas Pierratos; Uwe Querfeld
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.