BACKGROUND: Only a few published studies in children used several methods to compare body fat in large groups of fatter and leaner multiethnic children. We hypothesized that the preferred methods of determining body fat may differ in children with larger compared with smaller amounts of body fat, in boys compared with girls, and in African Americans compared with whites. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate several methods of predicting body fat in 10-12-y-old white and African American boys and girls. DESIGN: The body fat of 129 African American and white boys and girls aged 10-12 y, distributed equally by sex and race, was measured with use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), underwater weighing (densitometry), isotope dilution (H(2)18O), bioelectrical impedance, skinfold thicknesses, corporal diameters, and circumferences. RESULTS: With use of DXA as the criterion variable, body fat was bimodally distributed in the boys and skewed to higher values in the girls. Biceps skinfold thickness had the highest predictive value of any single skinfold thickness compared with DXA fat. All formulas for estimating body fat from skinfold thicknesses, body density, or impedance performed better in the children in the upper one-half of the fat distribution (the fatter children) than in those in the lower one-half (the leaner children). Body mass index was highly correlated with body fat (R2 = 0.77); there was a good correlation for the fatter children (R2 = 0.66) and no correlation for the leaner children (R2 = 0.09). The hydration of the fat-free mass was significantly higher in the fatter children than in the leaner ones (79.2% compared with 76.7%). CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with the hypothesis that all methods of estimating body fat work better in children with larger amounts of body fat. The best formulas use skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance, and a 4-compartment model.
BACKGROUND: Only a few published studies in children used several methods to compare body fat in large groups of fatter and leaner multiethnic children. We hypothesized that the preferred methods of determining body fat may differ in children with larger compared with smaller amounts of body fat, in boys compared with girls, and in African Americans compared with whites. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate several methods of predicting body fat in 10-12-y-old white and African American boys and girls. DESIGN: The body fat of 129 African American and white boys and girls aged 10-12 y, distributed equally by sex and race, was measured with use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), underwater weighing (densitometry), isotope dilution (H(2)18O), bioelectrical impedance, skinfold thicknesses, corporal diameters, and circumferences. RESULTS: With use of DXA as the criterion variable, body fat was bimodally distributed in the boys and skewed to higher values in the girls. Biceps skinfold thickness had the highest predictive value of any single skinfold thickness compared with DXA fat. All formulas for estimating body fat from skinfold thicknesses, body density, or impedance performed better in the children in the upper one-half of the fat distribution (the fatter children) than in those in the lower one-half (the leaner children). Body mass index was highly correlated with body fat (R2 = 0.77); there was a good correlation for the fatter children (R2 = 0.66) and no correlation for the leaner children (R2 = 0.09). The hydration of the fat-free mass was significantly higher in the fatter children than in the leaner ones (79.2% compared with 76.7%). CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with the hypothesis that all methods of estimating body fat work better in children with larger amounts of body fat. The best formulas use skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance, and a 4-compartment model.
Authors: Thomas N Robinson; Donna M Matheson; Helena C Kraemer; Darrell M Wilson; Eva Obarzanek; Nikko S Thompson; Sofiya Alhassan; Tirzah R Spencer; K Farish Haydel; Michelle Fujimoto; Ann Varady; Joel D Killen Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2010-11
Authors: Emma L Ross; Jennifer Jorgensen; Peter E DeWitt; Carol Okada; Renee Porter; Matthew Haemer; Pamela D Reiter Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2014-04
Authors: Nilesh M Mehta; Bram Raphael; Ivan M Guteirrez; Nicolle Quinn; Paul D Mitchell; Heather J Litman; Tom Jaksic; Christopher P Duggan Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Katie A Meyer; Sarah Friend; Peter J Hannan; John H Himes; Ellen W Demerath; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: Int J Pediatr Obes Date: 2011-07-12