Literature DB >> 11271897

The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists.

A Leslie1, A J Jones, P R Goddard.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine whether clinical information alters the CT report. This prospective blinded study consisted of 50 consecutive patients who attended a Department of Radiology for CT. Each study was interpreted by two of three consultant radiologists, before and after knowledge of the clinical information. 19 reports were changed after clinical information was known. Clinical follow-up was available in 15 cases. In ten cases the reports were more accurate after clinical information and in five cases the reports were less accurate. In three of the five cases where accuracy was reduced, the clinical information was incorrect. It was concluded that clinical information affects the CT report. If the information is accurate it has a beneficial effect; if it is inaccurate it has a detrimental effect. The more complex the investigation, the more important the clinical information. There was a correlation between readers regarding the influence of clinical information. Correct clinical information therefore improves the radiology report. It is the responsibility of the clinician to provide this information in an accurate and legible form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11271897     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.874.11271897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  33 in total

1.  Frontotemporal Dementia and Psychiatric Illness: Emerging Clinical and Biological Links in Gene Carriers.

Authors:  Nikolas R Block; Sharon J Sha; Anna M Karydas; Jamie C Fong; Mary G De May; Bruce L Miller; Howard J Rosen
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 2.  Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Alfonso Reginelli; Fabio Pinto; Giuseppe Lo Re; Federico Midiri; Carlo Muzj; Luigia Romano; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists.

Authors:  Hani H Abujudeh; Giles W Boland; Rathachai Kaewlai; Pavel Rabiner; Elkarn F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; James H Thrall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking.

Authors:  Richard FitzGerald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  General practitioners' views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Effect of diagnostic predictions combined with clinical information on avoiding perceptual errors of computed tomography.

Authors:  Shingo Suzuki; Masatomi Ikusaka; Yoshiyuki Ohira; Masahito Miyahara; Kazutaka Noda; Hideki Kajiwara; Kiyoshi Shikino; Takeshi Kondo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 7.  Errors in multidetector row computed tomography.

Authors:  M A Mazzei; L Volterrani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Evaluating the Referring Physician's Clinical History and Indication as a Means for Communicating Chronic Conditions That Are Pertinent at the Point of Radiologic Interpretation.

Authors:  Piotr Obara; Merlijn Sevenster; Adam Travis; Yuechen Qian; Charles Westin; Paul J Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Strategies for medical data extraction and presentation part 1: current limitations and deficiencies.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Integrity of clinical information in computerized order requisitions for diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Romeo Laroya; Aijia Wang; Neena Kapoor; Daniel I Glazer; Atul Shinagare; Ivan K Ip; Sameer Malhotra; Keith Hentel; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.