M R Chicoine1, E K Won, M C Zahner. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. mchicoine@POL.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Anecdotal reports documented extended survival times for patients who developed infections at the site of resection of malignant gliomas. Hypothesized mechanisms for this phenomenon include immune responses triggered by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). This investigation assessed whether LPS could produce tumor regression in an in vivo model of malignant glioma. METHODS: Delayed brain tumor cells (2 x 10(6)) were injected subcutaneously into female BALB/c mice. LPS (300-500 microg) was injected intratumorally or subcutaneously at a contralateral site on Days 10, 17, and 24. Control animals received phosphate-buffered saline intratumorally or subcutaneously. Mice were killed on Day 28, and tumors were removed. Mean tumor masses for control animals and the two LPS-treated groups (intratumoral or contralateral subcutaneous treatment) were compared. Histological assessments of treated and control tumors were performed. RESULTS: Complete or nearly total tumor regression was achieved in all 20 mice with subcutaneous delayed brain tumor cell tumors treated intratumorally with 400 microg of LPS (mean tumor mass of 0.09 +/- 0.38 g versus 2.42 +/- 2.46 g for control animals, P < 0.0001). Intratumoral administration of 300 microg of LPS or subcutaneous injection of 300 or 400 microg of LPS at a contralateral site resulted in less consistent regression of subcutaneous tumors. Administration of 500 microg of LPS resulted in tumor regression similar to that observed with lower doses but was limited by treatment-related deaths in 40% of animals. Histological assessment revealed lymphocytic infiltration of LPS-treated tumors. CONCLUSION: Intratumoral injections of LPS caused dramatic regression of subcutaneously implanted delayed brain tumor cell mouse gliomas. Investigation of this antitumoral effect may improve treatment responses for patients with malignant gliomas.
OBJECTIVE: Anecdotal reports documented extended survival times for patients who developed infections at the site of resection of malignant gliomas. Hypothesized mechanisms for this phenomenon include immune responses triggered by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). This investigation assessed whether LPS could produce tumor regression in an in vivo model of malignant glioma. METHODS: Delayed brain tumor cells (2 x 10(6)) were injected subcutaneously into female BALB/c mice. LPS (300-500 microg) was injected intratumorally or subcutaneously at a contralateral site on Days 10, 17, and 24. Control animals received phosphate-buffered saline intratumorally or subcutaneously. Mice were killed on Day 28, and tumors were removed. Mean tumor masses for control animals and the two LPS-treated groups (intratumoral or contralateral subcutaneous treatment) were compared. Histological assessments of treated and control tumors were performed. RESULTS: Complete or nearly total tumor regression was achieved in all 20 mice with subcutaneous delayed brain tumor cell tumors treated intratumorally with 400 microg of LPS (mean tumor mass of 0.09 +/- 0.38 g versus 2.42 +/- 2.46 g for control animals, P < 0.0001). Intratumoral administration of 300 microg of LPS or subcutaneous injection of 300 or 400 microg of LPS at a contralateral site resulted in less consistent regression of subcutaneous tumors. Administration of 500 microg of LPS resulted in tumor regression similar to that observed with lower doses but was limited by treatment-related deaths in 40% of animals. Histological assessment revealed lymphocytic infiltration of LPS-treated tumors. CONCLUSION: Intratumoral injections of LPS caused dramatic regression of subcutaneously implanted delayed brain tumor cell mousegliomas. Investigation of this antitumoral effect may improve treatment responses for patients with malignant gliomas.
Authors: Alvaro G Alvarado; Praveena S Thiagarajan; Erin E Mulkearns-Hubert; Daniel J Silver; James S Hale; Tyler J Alban; Soumya M Turaga; Awad Jarrar; Ofer Reizes; Michelle S Longworth; Michael A Vogelbaum; Justin D Lathia Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Guanshu Liu; Chetan Bettegowda; Yuan Qiao; Verena Staedtke; Kannie W Y Chan; Renyuan Bai; Yuguo Li; Gregory J Riggins; Kenneth W Kinzler; Jeff W M Bulte; Michael T McMahon; Assaf A Gilad; Bert Vogelstein; Shibin Zhou; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ilir Agalliu; Sadie Costello; Katie M Applebaum; Roberta M Ray; George Astrakianakis; Dao Li Gao; David B Thomas; Harvey Checkoway; Ellen A Eisen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Jason R Baird; Arta M Monjazeb; Omid Shah; Heather McGee; William J Murphy; Marka R Crittenden; Michael J Gough Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Virissa Lenters; Ioannis Basinas; Laura Beane-Freeman; Paolo Boffetta; Harvey Checkoway; David Coggon; Lützen Portengen; Malcolm Sim; Inge M Wouters; Dick Heederik; Roel Vermeulen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-12-12 Impact factor: 2.506