Literature DB >> 11267854

Mammographic size of ductal carcinoma in situ does not predict the presence of an invasive focus.

Y Wahedna1, A J Evans, S E Pinder, I O Ellis, R W Blamey, J G Geraghty.   

Abstract

A proportion of women thought to have ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on mammography and a core biopsy showing DCIS only, in fact have an invasive focus on surgical excision. This study aims to identify the percentage of such patients who harbour an invasive focus and to ascertain features which can predict the presence of invasion. 140 patients had a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS without invasion. All patients had their core biopsy graded and mammography was performed on 128 patients. Mammographic findings were classified by a radiologist blinded to the surgical findings into normal, mass/distortion or microcalcification. The extent of the microcalcifications was measured. The core biopsies were graded into high, intermediate or low grade DCIS groups. The core biopsy and radiological findings were compared to see if they could predict the presence of invasive disease at surgical excision. Of the 140 patients, 61 (44%) had an invasive focus. 8 (47%) of 17 patients with normal mammography had an invasive focus. 4 (36%) of 11 patients with a mammographic mass had evidence of invasion. Of the 100 patients with mammographic microcalcifications 48 (48%) had an invasive focus. In the 10 patients with low grade DCIS on core biopsy, 3 (30%) had an invasive focus. Comparative studies in patients with intermediate and high grade DCIS, were 7 of 18 (39%) and 51 of 112 (46%), respectively. Thus, 44% of women thought to have DCIS only on preoperative investigation had an invasive focus. In contrast to previous expressed opinions, neither mammography or grade were predictive. We have not identified any factor capable of predicting a higher likelihood of an invasive focus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11267854     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00397-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  8 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.

Authors:  Geunwon Kim; Peter G Mikhael; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Factors associated with upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy using imaging guidance.

Authors:  Cholatip Wiratkapun; Pachara Patanajareet; Bussanee Wibulpholprasert; Panuwat Lertsithichai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Predictors for upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive carcinoma in non-mass-type DCIS.

Authors:  Goshi Oda; Tsuyoshi Nakagawa; Ayumi Ogawa; Yuichi Kumaki; Tokuko Hosoya; Hitoshi Sugimoto; Toshiyuki Ishiba; Mori Mio; Tomoyuki Fujioka; Kazunori Kubota; Iichiroh Onishi; Hiroyuki Uetake
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-27

5.  Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

Authors:  Tawakalitu O Oseni; Barbara L Smith; Constance D Lehman; Charmi A Vijapura; Niveditha Pinnamaneni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Pure DCIS: Is It Necessary?

Authors:  D E Boler; N Cabioglu; U Ince; G Esen; C Uras
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-05-14

7.  Heterogeneity of focal breast lesions and surrounding tissue assessed by mammographic texture analysis: preliminary evidence of an association with tumor invasion and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Olga Strukowska; Karoline Skogen; Rupert Young; Chris Chatwin; Ken Miles
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Development and evaluation of a prediction model for underestimated invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ at stereotactic large core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Suzanne C E Diepstraten; Stephanie M W Y van de Ven; Ruud M Pijnappel; Petra H M Peeters; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Helena M Verkooijen; Sjoerd G Elias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.