Literature DB >> 11266673

Age, sex, and grip strength determine architectural bone parameters assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at the human radius.

Y Hasegawa1, P Schneider, C Reiners.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the relation of some noninvasively derived mechanical characteristics of radial bone including architectural parameters for bone strength to grip strength and muscle cross-section. Sixty-three males between 21 and 78yr of age and 101 females between 18 and 80yr of age were measured at the nondominant forearm using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). We assessed the integral bone mineral density (BMD(I)) and content (BMC(I)) by pQCT at the distal and at the mid-shaft radius. Integral bone area (Area(I)), cortical thickness (C-th), and a newly proposed index for bone strength; the stress-strain index (SSI) were also calculated. The dynamometrically measured maximum grip strength was taken as a mechanical loading parameter and muscle cross-section as a substitute for it. Sex, grip strength, BMC(I) and BMD(I) (distal radius) were identified in a multiple regression analysis to significantly predict bone strength as expressed by SSI, after adjusting for all other independent variables, including age and sex (p<0.0001). Grip strength was closest related to age, sex, BMD(I) and SSI(p) of the distal radius. The cross-sectional area of muscle was not significantly determining the grip strength within the analysis model. In conclusion, our results suggested that architectural parameters at the distal radius were better related to grip strength than to cross-sectional muscle area in both males and females. Maximum muscle strength as estimated by grip strength might be a stronger determinant of mechanical characteristics of bones as compared with cross-sectional muscle area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11266673     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00211-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  17 in total

1.  Predictive value of grip strength for bone mineral density in males: site specific or systemic?

Authors:  Gülümser Aydin; Ebru Atalar; Işik Keleş; Aliye Tosun; Gülfer Zöğ; Hatice Keleş; Sevim Orkun
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Muscle power and physical activity are associated with bone strength in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study.

Authors:  Julie M Cousins; Moira A Petit; Misti L Paudel; Brent C Taylor; Julie M Hughes; Jane A Cauley; Joseph M Zmuda; Peggy M Cawthon; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Volumetric bone mineral density and bone size in sleep-deprived individuals.

Authors:  B L Specker; T Binkley; M Vukovich; T Beare
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Rural vs. non-rural differences and longitudinal bone changes by DXA and pQCT in men aged 20-66 years: A population-based study.

Authors:  Bonny L Specker; Howard E Wey; Teresa L Binkley; Tianna M Beare; Maggie Minett; Lee Weidauer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Bone loss from high repetitive high force loading is prevented by ibuprofen treatment.

Authors:  N X Jain; A E Barr-Gillespie; B D Clark; D M Kietrys; C K Wade; J Litvin; S N Popoff; M F Barbe
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Is bone's response to mechanical signals dominated by muscle forces?

Authors:  Alexander G Robling
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Type 2 diabetes is associated with higher trabecular bone density but lower cortical bone density: the Vietnam Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  L T Ho-Pham; P M N Chau; A T Do; H C Nguyen; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Higher Hand Grip Strength Is Associated With Greater Radius Bone Size and Strength in Older Men and Women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Robert R McLean; Elizabeth J Samelson; Amanda L Lorbergs; Kerry E Broe; Marian T Hannan; Steven K Boyd; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-03-30

9.  Muscle size, strength, and physical performance and their associations with bone structure in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mark H Edwards; Celia L Gregson; Harnish P Patel; Karen A Jameson; Nicholas C Harvey; Avan Aihie Sayer; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Does bone resorption stimulate periosteal expansion? A cross-sectional analysis of β-C-telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX), genetic markers of the RANKL pathway, and periosteal circumference as measured by pQCT.

Authors:  John P Kemp; Adrian Sayers; Lavinia Paternoster; David M Evans; Kevin Deere; Beate St Pourcain; Nicholas J Timpson; Susan M Ring; Mattias Lorentzon; Terho Lehtimäki; Joel Eriksson; Mika Kähönen; Olli Raitakari; Marika Laaksonen; Harri Sievänen; Jorma Viikari; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; George Davey Smith; William D Fraser; Liesbeth Vandenput; Claes Ohlsson; Jon H Tobias
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.