Literature DB >> 29967929

Type 2 diabetes is associated with higher trabecular bone density but lower cortical bone density: the Vietnam Osteoporosis Study.

L T Ho-Pham1, P M N Chau2, A T Do2, H C Nguyen2, T V Nguyen2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

It is not clear why type 2 diabetes (T2D) has an increased risk of fracture despite higher areal bone mineral density. This study showed that compared with controls, T2D patients had higher trabecular bone density but lower cortical bone density, resulting in a lower bone strength.
INTRODUCTION: To define the association between type 2 diabetes and bone architecture and measures of bone strength.
METHODS: The study was part of the Vietnam Osteoporosis Study, in which 1115 women and 614 men aged ≥ 30 were randomly recruited from Ho Chi Minh City. HbA1c levels were measured with analyzers ADAMS™ A1c HA-8160 (Arkray, Kyoto, Japan). The diagnosis of T2D was made if HbA1c was ≥ 6.5%. Trabecular and cortical volumetric bone density (vBMD) was measured in the forearm and leg by a pQCT XCT2000 (Stratec, Germany). Polar stress strain index (pSSI) was derived from the pQCT measurements. Difference in bone parameters between T2D and non-diabetic individuals was assessed by the number of standard deviations (effect size [ES]) by the propensity score analysis.
RESULTS: The prevalence of T2D was ~ 8%. The results of propensity score matching for age, sex, and body mass index in 137 pairs of diabetic and non-diabetic individuals showed that T2D patients had significantly higher distal radius trabecular vBMD (ES 0.26; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.50), but lower cortical vBMD (ES - 0.22; - 0.46 to 0.00) and reduced pSSI (ES - 0.23; - 0.47 to - 0.02) compared with non-diabetic individuals. Multiple linear regression analysis based on the entire sample confirmed the results of the propensity score analysis.
CONCLUSION: Compared with non-diabetic individuals, patients with T2D have greater trabecular but lower cortical vBMD which leads to lower bone strength.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone strength index; Osteoporosis; Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT); Propensity score analysis; Type 2 diabetes; Volumetric bone density

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29967929     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4579-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  37 in total

Review 1.  Diabetes in Asia: epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Juliana C N Chan; Vasanti Malik; Weiping Jia; Takashi Kadowaki; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Kun-Ho Yoon; Frank B Hu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The relative contributions of lean tissue mass and fat mass to bone density in young women.

Authors:  M C Wang; L K Bachrach; M Van Loan; M Hudes; K M Flegal; P B Crawford
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  An increased osteoprotegerin serum release characterizes the early onset of diabetes mellitus and may contribute to endothelial cell dysfunction.

Authors:  Paola Secchiero; Federica Corallini; Assunta Pandolfi; Agostino Consoli; Riccardo Candido; Bruno Fabris; Claudio Celeghini; Silvano Capitani; Giorgio Zauli
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Association between lean mass, fat mass, and bone mineral density: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lan T Ho-Pham; Uyen D T Nguyen; Tuan V Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 6.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus and bone.

Authors:  J Compston
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  LRP6 mutation in a family with early coronary disease and metabolic risk factors.

Authors:  Arya Mani; Jayaram Radhakrishnan; He Wang; Alaleh Mani; Mohammad-Ali Mani; Carol Nelson-Williams; Khary S Carew; Shrikant Mane; Hossein Najmabadi; Dan Wu; Richard P Lifton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks.

Authors:  N D Nguyen; S A Frost; J R Center; J A Eisman; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Type 2 diabetes and risk of low-energy fractures in postmenopausal women: meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Joanna Dytfeld; Michał Michalak
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  10 in total

1.  Association between trabecular bone score and type 2 diabetes: a quantitative update of evidence.

Authors:  L T Ho-Pham; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The study of bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography in middle-aged and elderly men with abnormal glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Pei Zhang; Xiaofeng Huang; Yanping Gong; Yanhui Lu; Minyan Liu; Xiaoling Cheng; Nan Li; Chunlin Li
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Associations between markers of glucose metabolism and bone measures among diabetic and non-diabetic adults.

Authors:  Kelly Virecoulon Giudici; Natasha Aparecida Grande de França; Bárbara Santarosa Emo Peters; Regina Mara Fisberg; Lígia Araújo Martini
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2021-07-14

4.  The Correlation of Type 2 Diabetes Status with Bone Mineral Density in Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Xiaocong Yao; Xiaocheng Xu; Fang Jin; Zhongxin Zhu
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  Effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on the microstructures, mechanical properties and bone mineral compositions of lumbar spines in type 2 diabetic rats.

Authors:  Xiaorong Hu; He Gong; Aiqi Hou; Xiaodan Wu; Peipei Shi; Yingying Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 6.  Testosterone supplementation and bone parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  G Corona; W Vena; A Pizzocaro; V A Giagulli; D Francomano; G Rastrelli; G Mazziotti; A Aversa; A M Isidori; R Pivonello; L Vignozzi; E Mannucci; M Maggi; A Ferlin
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Trends in osteoporosis and mean bone density among type 2 diabetes patients in the US from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Yingke Xu; Qing Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for low bone density: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingying Qiu; Chengjiang Li; Zhichun Dong; Jing Wang
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.763

9.  Lycopene Improves Bone Quality and Regulates AGE/RAGE/NF-кB Signaling Pathway in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice.

Authors:  Bingke Xia; Ruyuan Zhu; Hao Zhang; Beibei Chen; Yage Liu; Xuan Dai; Zimengwei Ye; Dandan Zhao; Fangfang Mo; Sihua Gao; Xiang-Dong Wang; Dieter Bromme; Lili Wang; Xinxiang Wang; Dongwei Zhang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Prevalence of osteoporosis among the elderly population of Iran.

Authors:  Noushin Fahimfar; Sima Noorali; Shakiba Yousefi; Safoora Gharibzadeh; Gita Shafiee; Nekoo Panahi; Mahnaz Sanjari; Ramin Heshmat; Farshad Sharifi; Neda Mehrdad; Alireza Raeisi; Iraj Nabipour; Bagher Larijani; Afshin Ostovar
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.617

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.