Literature DB >> 11266597

Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the DNA-binding domain of mouse Sox-5.

P D Cary1, C M Read, B Davis, P C Driscoll, C Crane-Robinson.   

Abstract

The fold of the murine Sox-5 (mSox-5) HMG box in free solution has been determined by multidimensional NMR using (15)N-labeled protein and has been found to adopt the characteristic twisted L-shape made up of two wings: the major wing comprising helix 1 (F10--F25) and helix 2 (N32--A43), the minor wing comprising helix 3 (P51--Y67) in weak antiparallel association with the N-terminal extended segment. (15)N relaxation measurements show considerable mobility (reduced order parameter, S(2)) in the minor wing that increases toward the amino and carboxy termini of the chain. The mobility of residues C-terminal to Q62 is significantly greater than the equivalent residues of non-sequence-specific boxes, and these residues show a weaker association with the extended N-terminal segment than in non-sequence boxes. Comparison with previously determined structures of HMG boxes both in free solution and complexed with DNA shows close similarity in the packing of the hydrophobic cores and the relative disposition of the three helices. Only in hSRY/DNA does the arrangement of aromatic sidechains differ significantly from that of mSox-5, and only in rHMG1 box 1 bound to cisplatinated DNA does helix 1 have no kink. Helix 3 in mSox-5 is terminated by P68, a conserved residue in DNA sequence-specific HMG boxes, which results in the chain turning through approximately 90 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11266597      PMCID: PMC2249839          DOI: 10.1110/ps.32801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  61 in total

1.  Solution structure of the HMG protein NHP6A and its interaction with DNA reveals the structural determinants for non-sequence-specific binding.

Authors:  F H Allain; Y M Yen; J E Masse; P Schultze; T Dieckmann; R C Johnson; J Feigon
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Similarity of human mitochondrial transcription factor 1 to high mobility group proteins.

Authors:  M A Parisi; D A Clayton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The HMG domain of lymphoid enhancer factor 1 bends DNA and facilitates assembly of functional nucleoprotein structures.

Authors:  K Giese; J Cox; R Grosschedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-04-03       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Specific recognition of cruciform DNA by nuclear protein HMG1.

Authors:  M E Bianchi; M Beltrame; G Paonessa
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Solution structure of a DNA-binding domain from HMG1.

Authors:  C M Read; P D Cary; C Crane-Robinson; P C Driscoll; D G Norman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The solution structure and dynamics of the DNA-binding domain of HMG-D from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D N Jones; M A Searles; G L Shaw; M E Churchill; S S Ner; J Keeler; A A Travers; D Neuhaus
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  K Wüthrich; M Billeter; W Braun
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The Drosophila fish-hook gene encodes a HMG domain protein essential for segmentation and CNS development.

Authors:  P A Nambu; J R Nambu
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Nucleolar transcription factor hUBF contains a DNA-binding motif with homology to HMG proteins.

Authors:  H M Jantzen; A Admon; S P Bell; R Tjian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The DNA binding site of HMG1 protein is composed of two similar segments (HMG boxes), both of which have counterparts in other eukaryotic regulatory proteins.

Authors:  M E Bianchi; L Falciola; S Ferrari; D M Lilley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  The role of intercalating residues in chromosomal high-mobility-group protein DNA binding, bending and specificity.

Authors:  Janet Klass; Frank V Murphy; Susan Fouts; Melissa Serenil; Anita Changela; Jessica Siple; Mair E A Churchill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Conditionally disordered proteins: bringing the environment back into the fold.

Authors:  Andrew C Hausrath; Richard L Kingston
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Structure-specific nucleic acid recognition by L-motifs and their diverse roles in expression and regulation of the genome.

Authors:  Roopa Thapar
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-03-04

4.  A Model for Dimerization of the SOX Group E Transcription Factor Family.

Authors:  Sarah N Ramsook; Joyce Ni; Shokofeh Shahangian; Ana Vakiloroayaei; Naveen Khan; Jamie J Kwan; Logan W Donaldson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Structural analysis and DNA binding of the HMG domains of the human mitochondrial transcription factor A.

Authors:  Todd A Gangelhoff; Purnima S Mungalachetty; Jay C Nix; Mair E A Churchill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.