Literature DB >> 12771212

The role of intercalating residues in chromosomal high-mobility-group protein DNA binding, bending and specificity.

Janet Klass1, Frank V Murphy, Susan Fouts, Melissa Serenil, Anita Changela, Jessica Siple, Mair E A Churchill.   

Abstract

Ubiquitous high-mobility-group (HMGB) chromosomal proteins bind DNA in a non-sequence- specific fashion to promote chromatin function and gene regulation. Minor groove DNA binding of the HMG domain induces substantial DNA bending toward the major groove, and several interfacial residues contribute by DNA intercalation. The role of the intercalating residues in DNA binding, bending and specificity was systematically examined for a series of mutant Drosophila HMGB (HMG-D) proteins. The primary intercalating residue of HMG-D, Met13, is required both for high-affinity DNA binding and normal DNA bending. Leu9 and Tyr12 directly interact with Met13 and are required for HMG domain stability in addition to linear DNA binding and bending, which is an important function for these residues. In contrast, DNA binding and bending is retained in truncations of intercalating residues Val32 and Thr33 to alanine, but DNA bending is decreased for the glycine substitutions. Furthermore, substitution of the intercalating residues with those predicted to be involved in the specificity of the HMG domain transcription factors results in increased DNA affinity and decreased DNA bending without increased specificity. These studies reveal the importance of residues that buttress intercalating residues and suggest that features of the HMG domain other than a few base-specific hydrogen bonds distinguish the sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific HMG domain functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771212      PMCID: PMC156723          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  71 in total

1.  Structural studies of the high mobility group globular domain and basic tail of HMG-D bound to disulfide cross-linked DNA.

Authors:  L K Dow; D N Jones; S A Wolfe; G L Verdine; M E Churchill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Solution structure of the HMG protein NHP6A and its interaction with DNA reveals the structural determinants for non-sequence-specific binding.

Authors:  F H Allain; Y M Yen; J E Masse; P Schultze; T Dieckmann; R C Johnson; J Feigon
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The SRY cantilever motif discriminates between sequence- and structure-specific DNA recognition: alanine mutagenesis of an HMG box.

Authors:  M A Weiss; E Ukiyama; C Y King
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1997-10

Review 4.  DNA conformation and protein binding.

Authors:  A A Travers
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  The solution structure and dynamics of the DNA-binding domain of HMG-D from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D N Jones; M A Searles; G L Shaw; M E Churchill; S S Ner; J Keeler; A A Travers; D Neuhaus
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 6.  SRY and sex determination in mammals.

Authors:  P N Goodfellow; R Lovell-Badge
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Basis for recognition of cisplatin-modified DNA by high-mobility-group proteins.

Authors:  U M Ohndorf; M A Rould; Q He; C O Pabo; S J Lippard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Intercalating residues determine the mode of HMG1 domains A and B binding to cisplatin-modified DNA.

Authors:  Q He; U M Ohndorf; S J Lippard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Nucleolar transcription factor hUBF contains a DNA-binding motif with homology to HMG proteins.

Authors:  H M Jantzen; A Admon; S P Bell; R Tjian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The DNA binding site of HMG1 protein is composed of two similar segments (HMG boxes), both of which have counterparts in other eukaryotic regulatory proteins.

Authors:  M E Bianchi; L Falciola; S Ferrari; D M Lilley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  25 in total

1.  Dual binding modes for an HMG domain from human HMGB2 on DNA.

Authors:  Micah McCauley; Philip R Hardwidge; L James Maher; Mark C Williams
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Minor groove deformability of DNA: a molecular dynamics free energy simulation study.

Authors:  Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Crystal structure of QscR, a Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing signal receptor.

Authors:  Mario J Lintz; Ken-ichi Oinuma; Christina L Wysoczynski; Everett Peter Greenberg; Mair E A Churchill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Human mitochondrial transcription factor A induces a U-turn structure in the light strand promoter.

Authors:  Anna Rubio-Cosials; Jasmin F Sidow; Nereida Jiménez-Menéndez; Pablo Fernández-Millán; Julio Montoya; Howard T Jacobs; Miquel Coll; Pau Bernadó; Maria Solà
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 5.  Biophysical characterization of DNA binding from single molecule force measurements.

Authors:  Kathy R Chaurasiya; Thayaparan Paramanathan; Micah J McCauley; Mark C Williams
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Understanding apparent DNA flexibility enhancement by HU and HMGB architectural proteins.

Authors:  Luke Czapla; Justin P Peters; Emily M Rueter; Wilma K Olson; L James Maher
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Optical tweezers experiments resolve distinct modes of DNA-protein binding.

Authors:  Micah J McCauley; Mark C Williams
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Enhancement of DNA flexibility in vitro and in vivo by HMGB box A proteins carrying box B residues.

Authors:  Nadia T Sebastian; Emily M Bystry; Nicole A Becker; L James Maher
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  HMGB binding to DNA: single and double box motifs.

Authors:  Micah J McCauley; Jeff Zimmerman; L James Maher; Mark C Williams
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  The yeast high mobility group protein HMO2, a subunit of the chromatin-remodeling complex INO80, binds DNA ends.

Authors:  Sreerupa Ray; Anne Grove
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.