Literature DB >> 11266252

Long-term follow-up of 1059 consecutive primary and recurrent inguinal hernias in a teaching hospital.

K Søndenaa1, I Nesvik, K Breivik, H Kørner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the early and late outcome of various methods of inguinal hernia repair.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Teaching hospital, Norway.
SUBJECTS: 1059 repairs of inguinal hernias in men and women by 43 surgeons.
INTERVENTIONS: Analysis of patients charts, results of questionnaires concerning 712 hernias (67%) and follow-up consultations when needed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Freedom from recurrence and postoperative groin symptoms after repairs of primary and recurrent hernias.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, range 3-8, the recurrence rate was 8% for primary repairs and 29% after recurrent hernias. The incidence of permanent pain or discomfort was unexpectedly high, being 11% after primary repairs and 15% after recurrent hernia repairs.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of recurrences at long-term follow-up after repairs of primary and recurrent inguinal hernias was unsatisfactory. The extent of postoperative pain was surprising as this was not given enough attention during the learning period. We have introduced a uniform treatment policy with a prospective surveillance programme with the aim of improving results in our teaching programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11266252     DOI: 10.1080/110241501750070583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  13 in total

1.  Coskun repair of inguinal hernia. Response to Losanoff JE and Amid PK.

Authors:  Faruk Coskun; M Mahir Ozmen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Is the Lichtenstein operation of strangulated groin hernia a safe procedure?

Authors:  Andrzej Wysocki; Jan Kulawik; Marek Poźniczek; Marcin Strzałka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Inguinal hernia treatment with the Prolene Hernia System in a Dutch regional training hospital.

Authors:  C A S Berende; J P Ruurda; C E V B Hazenberg; J G Olsman; H J A A van Geffen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Pain and functional impairment 6 years after inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  E K Aasvang; M Bay-Nielsen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Long-term sequelae after 1,311 primary inguinal hernia repairs.

Authors:  S Massaron; S Bona; U Fumagalli; P Valente; R Rosati
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  The open preperitoneal approach to recurrent inguinal hernias in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Michael Baroody; Vivek Bansal; George Maish
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Factors Determining Outcome After Surgery for Chronic Groin Pain Following a Lichtenstein Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Willem A R Zwaans; Tim Verhagen; Rudi M H Roumen; Marc R M Scheltinga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A longitudinal follow-up using the high trans-scrotal approach for inguinal and scrotal abnormalities in boys.

Authors:  I H Gökçora; A Yagmurlu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Martin F Bjurstrom; Andrea L Nicol; Parviz K Amid; David C Chen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Comparison of Coskun and Lichteinstein hernia repair methods for groin hernia.

Authors:  Tolga Dinç; Hayri Mükerrem Cete; Barış Saylam; Mehmet Vasfi Özer; Arife Polat Düzgün; Faruk Coşkun
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.