Willem A R Zwaans1, Tim Verhagen2, Rudi M H Roumen2,3, Marc R M Scheltinga2,3. 1. Department of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands. willemzwaans@gmail.com. 2. Department of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 3. SolviMáx, Centre of Excellence for Abdominal Wall and Groin Pain, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some patients develop chronic groin pain after a Lichtenstein hernia repair. Previous studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of removal of entrapped inguinal nerves or a meshectomy in patients with chronic pain after open inguinal hernia mesh repair. Factors determining success following this remedial surgery are unknown. The aim of the study was to identify potential patient- or surgery-related factors predicting the surgical efficacy for inguinodynia following Lichtenstein repair. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with a history of persistent pain following Lichtenstein repair who underwent remedial surgery were analysed using univariate analysis. Significant confounders (p < 0.05) were combined in a multivariate logistic regression model using a backward stepwise regression method. RESULTS: A total of 136 groin pain operations were available for analysis. Factors contributing to success were removal of a meshoma (OR 4.66) or a neuroma (OR 5.60) and the use of spinal anaesthesia (OR 4.38). In contrast, female gender (OR 0.30) and preoperative opioid use (OR 0.38) were significantly associated with a less favourable outcome. Using a multivariate analysis model, surgery under spinal anaesthesia (OR 4.04), preoperative use of opioids (OR 0.37), and meshoma removal (OR 5.31) greatly determined surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pain reduction after remedial surgery for chronic groin pain after Lichtenstein repair is more successful if surgery is performed under spinal anaesthesia compared to general anaesthesia. Removal of a meshoma must be considered as success rates are optimized following these measures. Patients using opioids preoperatively have less favourable outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Some patients develop chronic groin pain after a Lichtenstein hernia repair. Previous studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of removal of entrapped inguinal nerves or a meshectomy in patients with chronic pain after open inguinal hernia mesh repair. Factors determining success following this remedial surgery are unknown. The aim of the study was to identify potential patient- or surgery-related factors predicting the surgical efficacy for inguinodynia following Lichtenstein repair. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with a history of persistent pain following Lichtenstein repair who underwent remedial surgery were analysed using univariate analysis. Significant confounders (p < 0.05) were combined in a multivariate logistic regression model using a backward stepwise regression method. RESULTS: A total of 136 groin pain operations were available for analysis. Factors contributing to success were removal of a meshoma (OR 4.66) or a neuroma (OR 5.60) and the use of spinal anaesthesia (OR 4.38). In contrast, female gender (OR 0.30) and preoperative opioid use (OR 0.38) were significantly associated with a less favourable outcome. Using a multivariate analysis model, surgery under spinal anaesthesia (OR 4.04), preoperative use of opioids (OR 0.37), and meshoma removal (OR 5.31) greatly determined surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS:Pain reduction after remedial surgery for chronic groin pain after Lichtenstein repair is more successful if surgery is performed under spinal anaesthesia compared to general anaesthesia. Removal of a meshoma must be considered as success rates are optimized following these measures. Patients using opioids preoperatively have less favourable outcomes.
Authors: Robert H Dworkin; Alec B O'Connor; Joseph Audette; Ralf Baron; Geoffrey K Gourlay; Maija L Haanpää; Joel L Kent; Elliot J Krane; Alyssa A Lebel; Robert M Levy; Sean C Mackey; John Mayer; Christine Miaskowski; Srinivasa N Raja; Andrew S C Rice; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett Stacey; Steven Stanos; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Dennis C Turk; Gary A Walco; Christopher D Wells Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Seong Heon Lee; Soo Young Cho; Hyung Gon Lee; Jeong Il Choi; Myung Ha Yoon; Woong Mo Kim Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Willem A R Zwaans; Christel W Perquin; Maarten J A Loos; Rudi M H Roumen; Marc R M Scheltinga Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.352