H Joesbury1, N Mathers, P Lane. 1. Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The North Trent scheme to address the problem of GPs whose performance gives cause for concern was implemented in 1997. This paper describes the structure and process of the scheme and evaluates the main outcomes. METHODS: We used non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews with representatives of the seven Health Authorities (HAs) of North Trent including medical and prescribing advisors and senior primary care managers. Twenty-one GPs who were members of the Performance Review Quartets (PRQs) were also interviewed. Qualitative data were analysed using a constant comparative method to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Performance indicators were agreed between HAs and the profession in the seven North Trent localities. The scheme identified 18 GPs whose performance gave cause for concern, of whom 15 GPs in six practices received a formal visit. Educational plans were agreed and implemented with three GPs. The remaining 12 received administrative and clinical support. Three of the 18 GPs initially refused to co-operate with the scheme. Two of these have since agreed a practice visit following a visit by a senior local medical committee representative. The performance indicators used in the scheme have not been specific to individual GPs except those in single-handed practices. Some indicators used by PRQs related to cost effectiveness rather than quality of care for individual patients. Current resources were adequate for the small number of underperforming GPs identified by the scheme. CONCLUSIONS: The North Trent scheme has identified a number of underperforming GPs, 83% of whom have been willing to participate in a supportive intervention. The scheme will need some modification with the advent of primary care trusts and the proposed assessment and support centres.
BACKGROUND: The North Trent scheme to address the problem of GPs whose performance gives cause for concern was implemented in 1997. This paper describes the structure and process of the scheme and evaluates the main outcomes. METHODS: We used non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews with representatives of the seven Health Authorities (HAs) of North Trent including medical and prescribing advisors and senior primary care managers. Twenty-one GPs who were members of the Performance Review Quartets (PRQs) were also interviewed. Qualitative data were analysed using a constant comparative method to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Performance indicators were agreed between HAs and the profession in the seven North Trent localities. The scheme identified 18 GPs whose performance gave cause for concern, of whom 15 GPs in six practices received a formal visit. Educational plans were agreed and implemented with three GPs. The remaining 12 received administrative and clinical support. Three of the 18 GPs initially refused to co-operate with the scheme. Two of these have since agreed a practice visit following a visit by a senior local medical committee representative. The performance indicators used in the scheme have not been specific to individual GPs except those in single-handed practices. Some indicators used by PRQs related to cost effectiveness rather than quality of care for individual patients. Current resources were adequate for the small number of underperforming GPs identified by the scheme. CONCLUSIONS: The North Trent scheme has identified a number of underperforming GPs, 83% of whom have been willing to participate in a supportive intervention. The scheme will need some modification with the advent of primary care trusts and the proposed assessment and support centres.