Literature DB >> 11263620

Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

K Wei1, E Le, J P Bin, M Coggins, J Thorpe, S Kaul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU) to quantify renal tissue perfusion.
BACKGROUND: The kinetics of tracers used to assess renal perfusion are often complicated by countercurrent exchange, tubular transport or glomerular filtration. We hypothesized that, because gas-filled microbubbles are pure intravascular tracers with a rheology similar to that of red blood cells, CEU could be used to quantify renal tissue perfusion.
METHODS: During a continuous venous infusion of microbubbles (SonoVue), regional renal perfusion was quantified in nine dogs using CEU by destroying microbubbles and measuring their tissue replenishment with intermittent harmonic imaging. Both renal blood volume fraction and microbubble velocity were derived from pulsing-interval versus video-intensity plots. The product of the two was used to calculate renal nutrient blood flow. Renal arterial blood flow was independently measured with ultrasonic flow probes placed directly on the renal artery and was increased using dopamine and decreased by placement of a renal artery stenosis.
RESULTS: An excellent correlation was found between cortical nutrient blood flow using microbubbles and ultrasonic flow probe-derived renal blood flow (r = 0.82, p < 0.001) over a wide range (2.5 fold) of flows.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound examination during microbubble infusion can be used to quantify total organ as well as regional nutrient blood flow to the kidney.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11263620     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01210-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  63 in total

1.  Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Leveraging the power of ultrasound for therapeutic design and optimization.

Authors:  Charles F Caskey; Xiaowen Hu; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Individual lipid encapsulated microbubble radial oscillations: Effects of fluid viscosity.

Authors:  Brandon Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  [Vascular imaging with contrast-enhanced sonography for experimental use].

Authors:  M Krix; H-U Kauczor; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  [Ultrasound contrast agents: substance classes, pharmacokinetics, clinical applications, safety aspects].

Authors:  C Krestan
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Acoustic techniques for assessing the Optison destruction threshold.

Authors:  Tyrone M Porter; Denise A B Smith; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 7.  Microbubbles and ultrasound: a bird's eye view.

Authors:  Sanjiv Kaul
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2004

Review 8.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  [A new method for standardized diagnosis following renal transplantation. Ultrasound with contrast enhancement].

Authors:  T Fischer; V Ebeling; M Giessing; M Mühler; S Filimonow; J Dieckhöfer; A Lembcke; J Rudolph; S Morgera; K Budde; B Hamm; A Thomas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Effects of high-fat diet and losartan on renal cortical blood flow using contrast ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Anne-Emilie Declèves; Joshua J Rychak; Dan J Smith; Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2013-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.