Literature DB >> 11261349

Fatigue reduces tonic accommodation.

S Hasebe1, E W Graf, C M Schor.   

Abstract

Ocular accommodation adopts a mean baseline response level of approximately 1.0 D in the absence of blur feedback (open-loop state). This baseline or tonic accommodation (TA) can be elevated following a sustained monocular accommodative response to a dioptric stimulus (lens adaptation) that exceeds the baseline open-loop level of TA. The accommodative response to the lens persists in the open-loop state (accommodative hysteresis), and eventually decays to a stable end-point. Interestingly, if the baseline TA is high, the monocularly adapted accommodative state can decay to an end-point that is below the initial pre-adapted baseline level of the TA (counter-adaptive response) (McBrien, N.A. and Millodot, M., (1988). Differences in adaptation of TA with refractive state. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 29, 460-469). We have investigated the possible contribution of accommodation fatigue to the counter-adaptive change in baseline TA following sustained accommodation. Two fatigue procedures were used while viewing a target at 66 or 33 cm. In a monocular condition, accommodation was stimulated for 3 min with lens values alternating from -1.5 to +1.5 D at a rate of 0.25 Hz. In the binocular condition, convergence was stimulated with alternating prism values from 9 prism diopters (PD) base-out to 9 PD base-in. Both monocular and binocular tasks resulted in a significant reduction of TA. These results suggest that previously reported reductions of baseline TA following sustained monocular accommodation or binocular convergence could have resulted from fatigue of the accommodative system. Accommodative fatigue could be responsible for the lower values of TA observed in counter-adaptive responses to sustained accommodative or convergence effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11261349     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00558.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  6 in total

1.  Can tonic accommodation predict surgical performance?

Authors:  J Shah; I Paul; D Buckley; H Davis; J P Frisby; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin M Schartz; John Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 Autorefractor.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Jamie Houser; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Dynamics of accommodative fatigue in rhesus monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Abhiram S Vilupuru; Sanjeev Kasthurirangan; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Diurnal variations of amplitude of accommodation in different age groups.

Authors:  Sun-Mi Park; Byeong-Yeon Moon; Sang-Yeob Kim; Dong-Sik Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Correcting magnification error in foveal avascular zone area measurements of optical coherence tomography angiography images with estimated axial length.

Authors:  Deepaysh D C S Dutt; Seyhan Yazar; Jason Charng; David A Mackey; Fred K Chen; Danuta M Sampson
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.