Literature DB >> 11260600

Knowledge of Down syndrome in pregnant women from different ethnic groups.

V N Chilaka1, J C Konje, C R Stewart, H Narayan, D J Taylor.   

Abstract

The uptake of any screening test is influenced by knowledge of the condition being screened for. In the present study, the knowledge and the source of knowledge of women offered antenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS) was assessed by means of a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered to 300 consecutive women booking for antenatal care, of the 245 (82%) women who completed and returned the questionnaire, 117 (48%) were Caucasian, 85 (35%) were Asian born outside the UK, 32 (13%) were Asian born in the UK and ten (4%) belonged to other categories. Only 30% of the cohort had a good understanding of the condition. Racial groups other than Caucasian had a poorer understanding of DS. The factors which affected knowledge of DS included quality of spoken English, knowing an affected child, parity and religion. The most significant factor affecting acceptance of screening was the woman's knowledge of DS. The source of information for the condition varied widely: 42% from a general practitioners (GP), 24% from the hospital and 16% from midwives. The proportion with good knowledge was similar in those women whose source of information was the GP (45%) and the midwife (41%). These proportions were, however, higher (though not significantly) when the source of information was from magazines and newspapers (67%) and from friends (53%). Uptake of the screening test was best in those with good knowledge (53%) compared to those with poor knowledge (23%) (p<0.02). Between 28% and 66% (depending on the ethnic group) of women had a screening blood test "allegedly" without knowing why it had been performed. In order to improve uptake of the screening test for DS there is need for better education and counselling of women attending for antenatal care. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11260600     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0223(200103)21:3<159::aid-pd20>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Socioeconomic barriers to informed decisionmaking regarding maternal serum screening for down syndrome: results of the French National Perinatal Survey of 1998.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Béatrice Blondel; Catherine de Vigan; Gérard Bréart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Grace Ames; Sylvia Ann Metcalfe; Alison Dalton Archibald; Rony Emily Duncan; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Effectiveness of pre-counseling genetic education workshops at a large urban community health center serving low-income Chinese American women.

Authors:  Shao-Chee Sim; Xiaojie Diana Zhou; Laureen D Hom; Christine Chen; Rebecca Sze
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Women's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about Down syndrome: a qualitative research study.

Authors:  Denise M Levis; Shelly Harris; Nedra Whitehead; Rebecca Moultrie; Kara Duwe; Sonja A Rasmussen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?

Authors:  Julie A Quinlivan; Zain Battikhi; Rodney W Petersen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access.

Authors:  Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Inez D de Beaufort; Eline M Bunnik; Adriana Kater-Kuipers
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.