Literature DB >> 11258639

Comparison of two questionnaires with a tri-axial accelerometer to assess physical activity patterns.

R M Philippaerts1, K R Westerterp, J Lefevre.   

Abstract

Two physical activity questionnaires were evaluated against cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak), and a tri-axial accelerometer for movement registration (Tracmor) in 166 men, aged 40 years, within the framework of the Leuven Longitudinal Study on Lifestyle, Fitness, and Health. Tracmor data were obtained during four successive days. Besides the work index, the sport index, and the total activity index from the Baecke questionnaire, the subjective activity score, calculated energy expenditure during work, work index, and the total activity index from the Tecumseh Community questionnaire showed significant correlation coefficients with the mean Tracmor output (r = 0.26-0.47, p < 0.01). The questionnaire submeasures and the Tracmor output as generated in the same physical activity dimension showed the same relationships (r = 0.22-0.50, p < 0.01). Multiple stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analyses showed the Baecke questionnaire as the best indicator of the subject's physical activity level. Extra information about the physical activity level was given by two Tecumseh submeasures, e.g. energy expenditure during work and sleeping time. The results indicated that the Baecke questionnaire is superior in large-scale studies because of simplicity. However, the Tecumseh questionnaire can give detailed information about physical activity patterns and energy expenditure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11258639     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-11359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  17 in total

Review 1.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard; Yukitoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Accelerometer use in a physical activity intervention trial.

Authors:  Melissa A Napolitano; Kelley E Borradaile; Beth A Lewis; Jessica A Whiteley; Jaime L Longval; Alfred F Parisi; Anna E Albrecht; Christopher N Sciamanna; John M Jakicic; George D Papandonatos; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires.

Authors:  Hendrik J F Helmerhorst; Søren Brage; Janet Warren; Herve Besson; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Can lay-led walking programmes increase physical activity in middle aged adults? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S E Lamb; H P Bartlett; A Ashley; W Bird
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Lean and weight stable: behavioral predictors and psychological correlates.

Authors:  Kirsten Krahnstoever Davison; Leann Lipps Birch
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2004-07

7.  Assessment of physical activity and inactivity in multiple domains of daily life: a comparison between a computerized questionnaire and the SenseWear Armband complemented with an electronic diary.

Authors:  Tineke Scheers; Renaat Philippaerts; Johan Lefevre
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Physical Activity, Weight Loss, and Weight Maintenance in the DiOGenes Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Marleen A van Baak; Gabby Hul; Arne Astrup; Wim H Saris
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  A case-control study of physical activity patterns and risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jian Gong; Hannia Campos; Joseph Mark A Fiecas; Stephen T McGarvey; Robert Goldberg; Caroline Richardson; Ana Baylin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Television, physical activity, diet, and body weight status: the ARIC cohort.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Meyer; Kelly R Evenson; David J Couper; June Stevens; Mark A Pereria; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.