Literature DB >> 11257242

Comparison of the lipoprotein, carbohydrate, and hemostatic effects of phasic oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or levonorgestrel.

R H Knopp1, F E Broyles, M Cheung, K Moore, S Marcovina, W L Chandler.   

Abstract

Desogestrel (DSG) is a less-androgenic progestogen than levonorgestrel (LNG). This difference in androgenicity may be responsible for observed differences in metabolic effects between oral contraceptive (OC) formulations containing almost equivalent estrogen doses but with either DSG or LNG as a progestogen. To test the hypothesis, a prospective 9-month randomized comparison of plasma lipids, glucose, insulin, hemostasis, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) was conducted in 66 healthy women using phasic formulations of OCs containing either DSG (DSG-OC) or LNG (LNG-OC). The study results showed that SHBG increased 3-fold with DSG-OC and 2-fold with LNG-OC. DSG-OC increased HDL-C, HDL(2)-C and HDL(3)-C; LDL-C decreased transiently. LNG-OC decreased HDL(2)-C and increased HDL(3)-C; HDL-C was unchanged and LDL-C decreased transiently. Both formulations increased VLDL-C and triglycerides, more with DSG-OC, but apolipoprotein B levels increased equally. Apo A-I and A-II increased more with DSG-OC than with LNG-OC. Neither formulation altered Lp(a) or fasting glucose and insulin levels. Postprandially, both formulations decreased glucose and increased insulin responses, but to an equivalent degree. Both OCs slightly enhanced procoagulant and profibrinolytic parameters to the same extent except for internally compensating decreases in Factor V and protein S with DSG-OC. In summary, at almost equivalent estrogen doses, a phasic OC containing DSG compared with LNG has a less androgenic effect on lipoproteins and SHBG, similar effects on hemostatic parameters with lower protein S and factor V activity and equivalent effects on carbohydrate metabolism. The lipoprotein, SHBG, and protein S and factor V differences are likely due to the lesser androgenicity of DSG allowing for a greater expression of the dose of estrogen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11257242     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(00)00196-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

Review 1.  Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: physiological background, clinical importance and drug treatment.

Authors:  Martin Hersberger; Arnold von Eckardstein
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Estrogen therapies, lipids, and the heart disease prevention controversy.

Authors:  Robert H Knopp; Keiko Aikawa; Eleanor A Knopp
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Metabolic effects of contraceptive steroids.

Authors:  Regine Sitruk-Ware; Anita Nath
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Effects of switching from oral to transdermal or transvaginal contraception on markers of thrombosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Jensen; Anne E Burke; Kurt T Barnhart; Carrie Tillotson; Marci Messerle-Forbes; Dawn Peters
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Effects of Second and Third Generation Oral Contraceptives on Lipid and Carbohydrate Metabolism in Overweight and Obese Women: A Randomized Triple-Blind Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mahnaz Shahnazi; Azizeh Farshbaf-Khalili; Samira Pourzeinali-Beilankouh; Farnaz Sadrimehr
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 0.611

6.  Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release.

Authors:  Alexandra Ycaza Herrera; Sophia Faude; Shawn E Nielsen; Mallory Locke; Mara Mather
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2019-03-05

7.  Previous contraceptive treatment relates to grey matter volumes in the hippocampus and basal ganglia.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; TiAnni Harris; Esmeralda Hidalgo-Lopez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.