Literature DB >> 11255919

A labor-supply analysis of cocaine self-administration under progressive-ratio schedules: antecedents, methodologies, and perspectives.

J K Rowlett1.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Under a progressive-ratio (PR) schedule, a subject must complete increasing fixed-ratio (FR) response requirements to obtain reinforcers. Response requirements are increased until responding stops; the final ratio completed being the "break point" and providing an index of the relative effectiveness, or value, of the reinforcer to maintain behavior.
OBJECTIVES: This review examines the historical and conceptual framework underlying the PR procedure and examines the concept of relative reinforcer value. Pharmacological analysis (based on receptor theory), and behavior analysis (based on microeconomic theory) are reviewed.
METHODS: Using a microeconomic adaptation of the reinforcement model referred to as conservation, a mathematical model of PR performance is proposed based on the curvilinear relationship between economic supply and labor. Drug consumption and instrumental responding were assumed to reflect deviations from a balance point, defined as the levels of consumption and responding under no scheduled restraint. Data sets were re-analyzed in which several response sequences were examined in rhesus monkeys maintained on PR schedules of intravenous cocaine delivery.
RESULTS: The modified conservation equation fitted the PR data accurately, and results consistent with both linear and concave labor-supply functions were obtained. These results suggest that cocaine self-administration under PR schedules conforms to labor-supply relationships characterized as inelastic (consumption is resistant to increases in schedule requirements) and unit elastic (at high response costs, consumption declines with no corresponding increase or decrease in total responding).
CONCLUSIONS: The labor-supply methodology allows for a definition of the relative value of a drug reinforcer in PR studies based on changes in consumption across response costs. Specifically, relative reinforcer value is defined in terms of changes in behavior from a balance point, rather than as a property that determines the strength of the instrumental response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11255919     DOI: 10.1007/s002130000610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  31 in total

1.  Relation between choice of ethanol concentration and response rates under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: studies with rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Thomas H Gomez; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Self-administration of heroin in rats: effects of low-level lead exposure during gestation and lactation.

Authors:  Angelica Rocha; Rodrigo Valles; Aaron L Cardon; Gerald R Bratton; Jack R Nation
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Human behavioral pharmacology, past, present, and future: symposium presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Behavioral Pharmacology Society.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Harriet de Wit; Stephen T Higgins; Galen R Wenger; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Self-administration of cocaine and remifentanil by monkeys: choice between single drugs and mixtures.

Authors:  Kevin B Freeman; William L Woolverton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.

Authors:  Z Zhang; J F Rickard; K Asgari; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  The role of central dopamine D3 receptors in drug addiction: a review of pharmacological evidence.

Authors:  Christian A Heidbreder; Eliot L Gardner; Zheng-Xiong Xi; Panayotis K Thanos; Manolo Mugnaini; Jim J Hagan; Charles R Ashby
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2005-07

7.  Effect of reinforcer magnitude on performance maintained by progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J F Rickard; S Body; Z Zhang; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications.

Authors:  S D Comer; J B Ashworth; R W Foltin; C E Johanson; J P Zacny; S L Walsh
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Effects of menstrual cycle phase on cocaine self-administration in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Ziva D Cooper; Richard W Foltin; Suzette M Evans
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Escalation of intravenous cocaine self-administration, progressive-ratio performance, and reinstatement in rats selectively bred for high (HiS) and low (LoS) saccharin intake.

Authors:  Andrew D Morgan; Nancy K Dess; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.