Literature DB >> 11254413

The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance.

D L Harris1, A T Carr.   

Abstract

The DAS59 has been designed and developed to meet the need for an objective measure of the spectrum of psychological distress and dysfunction that is characteristic of disfigurements, deformities and aesthetic problems of appearance. Content validity has been assured by basing the scale's items on a detailed autobiographical study of representative patients. Internal consistency is high (0.98) and test-retest reliabilities are good (general population: 0.75; clinical population: 0.86). Correlations with other appropriate standardised tests show good criterion validity and good construct validity. Factor analysis of 2741 data sets (general population and clinical population) identified three factors that are not feature specific and two that are (bodily and sexual features, facial features). The DAS59 thus generates a full-scale score and five factorial sub-scale scores. The DAS59 has been standardised on the clinical population across a range of patient groups and on the general population subdivided into those concerned and those not concerned about appearance. The DAS59 is highly sensitive as a measure of change following treatment with large and significant preoperative-postoperative reductions in full-scale and factorial scores of patients treated for facial features or bodily/sexual features. The DAS59 offers benefits for patient selection in both cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery and in the evaluation of outcome. It provides valid and reliable data for clinical audit and governance and for evaluating the merits of one treatment protocol against another. Copyright 2001 The British Association of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11254413     DOI: 10.1054/bjps.2001.3559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  24 in total

1.  Use of the Derriford Appearance Scale 59 to assess patient-reported outcomes in secondary cleft surgery.

Authors:  Sophie Ricketts; Eran Regev; Oleh M Antonyshyn; Alex Kiss; Jeffrey A Fialkov
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 2.  We need to pay heed to the psychosocial aspects of strabismus.

Authors:  I B Marsh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  A systematic review of body image measures for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC).

Authors:  Chindhu Shunmuga Sundaram; Haryana M Dhillon; Phyllis N Butow; Puma Sundaresan; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Satisfaction and quality-of-life issues in body contouring surgery patients: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Amie Scott; Jessica Johnson; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  The postpartum abdomen: psychology, surgery and quality of life.

Authors:  S-J Edmondson; D A Ross
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Persistent self-consciousness about facial appearance, measured with the Derriford appearance scale 59, in patients after long-term biochemical remission of acromegaly.

Authors:  S H P P Roerink; M A E M Wagenmakers; J F Wessels; R B T M Sterenborg; J W Smit; A R M M Hermus; R T Netea-Maier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception: cross-validation for head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Pascal Jean-Pierre; Christopher Fundakowski; Enrique Perez; Shadae E Jean-Pierre; Ashley R Jean-Pierre; Angelica B Melillo; Rachel Libby; Zoukaa Sargi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The effect of rhinoplasty on psychosocial distress level and quality of life.

Authors:  Ceren Günel; Imran Kurt Omurlu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Look good feel better workshops: a "big lift" for women with cancer.

Authors:  Linda R Taggart; Laura Ozolins; Heather Hardie; Joyce Nyhof-Young
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 10.  How to use outcomes questionnaires: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.