OBJECTIVE: The Internal State Scale (ISS) is a self-report instrument that has been validated for discriminating mood states in patients with bipolar disorder. This study a) extends investigation to a multisite public sector sample and b) tests a revised scoring algorithm that formally identifies patients in mixed states. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with bipolar disorder from four Veterans Affairs medical centers were assessed in a cross-sectional design. Physician-conducted semi-structured interviews used DSM-IV criteria to identify subjects as meeting criteria for euthymia, mania or hypomania, depression, or mixed state (mania or hypomania plus depression). A revised ISS scoring algorithm independently assigned mood state. Mean subscale scores were analyzed across groups. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine optimal algorithm structure. RESULTS: Analysis of mean scores for the ISS subscales replicated original results for Activation, Well-Being, and Perceived Conflict, but indicated differences from the original results for the Depression Index. The ROC curve analysis identified optimal cut-off scores for the revised algorithm. The overall kappa score indicated moderate agreement between ISS and physician ratings of mood state, including mixed states. LIMITATIONS: The study used a sample consisting primarily of male veterans. Mood state was assigned by experts using expert clinician diagnosis, not structured interviews. CONCLUSION: The performance of the ISS in this multisite, public sector sample was similar to the performance in the initial research clinic sample. This finding confirms the validity of the ISS as a discriminator of mood states in bipolar disorder. The development of a revised scoring algorithm makes feasible formal identification of mixed episodes with the ISS.
OBJECTIVE: The Internal State Scale (ISS) is a self-report instrument that has been validated for discriminating mood states in patients with bipolar disorder. This study a) extends investigation to a multisite public sector sample and b) tests a revised scoring algorithm that formally identifies patients in mixed states. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with bipolar disorder from four Veterans Affairs medical centers were assessed in a cross-sectional design. Physician-conducted semi-structured interviews used DSM-IV criteria to identify subjects as meeting criteria for euthymia, mania or hypomania, depression, or mixed state (mania or hypomania plus depression). A revised ISS scoring algorithm independently assigned mood state. Mean subscale scores were analyzed across groups. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine optimal algorithm structure. RESULTS: Analysis of mean scores for the ISS subscales replicated original results for Activation, Well-Being, and Perceived Conflict, but indicated differences from the original results for the Depression Index. The ROC curve analysis identified optimal cut-off scores for the revised algorithm. The overall kappa score indicated moderate agreement between ISS and physician ratings of mood state, including mixed states. LIMITATIONS: The study used a sample consisting primarily of male veterans. Mood state was assigned by experts using expert clinician diagnosis, not structured interviews. CONCLUSION: The performance of the ISS in this multisite, public sector sample was similar to the performance in the initial research clinic sample. This finding confirms the validity of the ISS as a discriminator of mood states in bipolar disorder. The development of a revised scoring algorithm makes feasible formal identification of mixed episodes with the ISS.
Authors: Juliette M Slomka; John D Piette; Edward P Post; Sarah L Krein; Zongshan Lai; David E Goodrich; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Shawna N Smith; Daniel Almirall; Katherine Prenovost; Celeste Liebrecht; Julia Kyle; Daniel Eisenberg; Mark S Bauer; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Joseph M Cerimele; Simon B Goldberg; Christopher J Miller; Stephen W Gabrielson; John C Fortney Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; David E Goodrich; Kristina M Nord; Celeste Van Poppelen; Julia Kyle; Mark S Bauer; Jeanette A Waxmonsky; Zongshan Lai; Hyungjin M Kim; Daniel Eisenberg; Marshall R Thomas Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2015-09
Authors: Laurel A Copeland; Alexander L Miller; Deborah E Welsh; John F McCarthy; John E Zeber; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Maria Syl D de la Cruz; Zongshan Lai; David E Goodrich; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Snežana Urošević; Eric A Youngstrom; Paul Collins; Jonathan B Jensen; Monica Luciana Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; David E Goodrich; Zongshan Lai; Julia Clogston; Jeanette Waxmonsky; Mark S Bauer Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.084