Literature DB >> 11251657

Microbial analysis of bone collected during implant surgery: a clinical and laboratory study.

M P Young1, D H Carter, H Worthington, M Korachi, D B Drucker.   

Abstract

Dental implant surgery produces bone debris which can be used to correct bone defects in the "simultaneous-augmentation" technique. However, this debris is potentially contaminated with oral bacteria. Therefore, this study examined bone debris collected during dental implant surgery in order 1) to identify the microbial contaminants and 2) to compare the effects of two different aspiration protocols on the levels of microbial contamination. Twenty-four partially dentate patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups and underwent bone collection using the Frios Bone Collector during surgery to insert two endosseous dental implants. In group S (using a stringent aspiration protocol), bone collection occurred within the surgical site only. In group NS (utilizing a non-stringent aspiration protocol), bone collection and tissue fluid control was achieved using the same suction tip. Bone samples were immediately transported for microbial analysis. Colonial and microscopic morphology, gaseous requirements and identification kits were utilized for identification of the isolated microbes. Twenty-eight species were identified including a number associated with disease, in particular, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis as well as the anaerobes Actinomyces odontolyticus, Eubacterium sp., Prevotella intermedia, Propionibacterium propionicum and Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus. In group S (stringent aspiration protocol), significantly fewer organisms were found than in group NS, the non-stringent aspiration protocol (P=0.001). Gram-positive cocci dominated the isolates from both groups. It is concluded that if bone debris is collected for implantation around dental implants, it should be collected with a stringent aspiration protocol (within the surgical site only) to minimize bacterial contaminants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11251657     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002095.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  8 in total

1.  [Bone collected with a bone collector during dental implant surgery].

Authors:  Johannes J Kuttenberger; Nicolas Hardt; Trudy Rutz; Gaby E Pfyffer
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-01

Review 2.  The management of severe hypodontia. Part 2: bone augmentation and the provision of implant supported prostheses.

Authors:  K Durey; L Carter; M Chan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  Actinomyces and related organisms in human infections.

Authors:  Eija Könönen; William G Wade
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Increased infection rates of sinus floor elevations after the use of a bone filter.

Authors:  Nicolai M Purcz; Falk Birkenfeld; Marc Oetke; Marcus Will; Larissa Purcz; Volker Gaßling; Yahya Acil; Joerg Wiltfang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Reducing Bacterial Contamination of Autologous Bone Graft Collected from Implant Site.

Authors:  Rodolfo Mauceri; Giuseppina Campisi; Domenica Matranga; Nicola Mauceri; Giuseppe Pizzo; Dario Melilli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Gelatin-hydroxyapatite nano-fibers as promising scaffolds for guided tissue regeneration (GTR): Preparation, assessment of the physicochemical properties and the effect on mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Simin Sharifi; Mohammad Samiei; Elaheh Dalir Abdolahinia; Rovshan Khalilov; Shahriar Shahi; Solmaz Maleki Dizaj
Journal:  J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent       Date:  2020-04-08

Review 7.  Biomaterials for periodontal regeneration: a review of ceramics and polymers.

Authors:  Li Shue; Zhang Yufeng; Ullas Mony
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

8.  Risk of bacterial contamination of bone harvesting devices used for autogenous bone graft in implant surgery.

Authors:  Megumi Takamoto; Masaaki Takechi; Kouji Ohta; Yoshiaki Ninomiya; Shigehiro Ono; Hideo Shigeishi; Misato Tada; Nobuyuki Kamata
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.151

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.