Literature DB >> 11249164

Decompression, fusion, and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis.

K K Hansraj1, P F O'Leary, F P Cammisa, J C Hall, C I Fras, M S Cohen, F J Dorey.   

Abstract

Between 1990 and 1993, 54 consecutive patients were treated with decompression, fusion and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis. The mean age of the patients was 60 years. The average followup was 39 months. Clinically, there was one deep wound infection, and three mechanical failures. There were two staged operations. There were three revision surgeries performed for mechanical reasons. Of the 47 patients who completed the questionnaire, 96% of patients were very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the operation, 98% were satisfied with relief of pain, 94% were satisfied with their ability to walk, 89% were satisfied with their strength, and 94% were satisfied with balance. Survivorship analysis (failure endpoint was revision surgery) revealed that at the end of 4 years, the patient had a 92% chance of not undergoing revision surgery for any reason (mechanical and infectious), and a 94% chance of not undergoing revision surgery for mechanical reasons. Lumbar decompression, fusion, and instrumentation surgery seems to be efficacious in patients with complex lumbar spinal stenosis (associated previous lumbar spine operations with evidence of radiographic instability, radiographic evidence of junctional stenosis after surgery, radiographic evidence of instability, degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than Grade I with instability, if present, and degenerative scoliosis with a curve greater than 20 degrees).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11249164     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200103000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian version of the spinal stenosis measure.

Authors:  Elisabeth Thornes; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Kosmas S Stafilas; Anastasios V Korompilias; Konstantinos C Zacharis; Alexandros E Beris; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Ryohei Kagotani; Hiroshi Yamada; Hiroshi Hashizume; Akihito Minamide; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  LumbSten: the lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study.

Authors:  Johann Steurer; Alexander Nydegger; Ulrike Held; Florian Brunner; Jürg Hodler; François Porchet; Kan Min; Anne F Mannion; Beat Michel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Swaroop Das; Tushar S Kunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  How do validated measures of functional outcome compare with commonly used outcomes in administrative database research for lumbar spinal surgery?

Authors:  Daniel Omoto; S Samuel Bederman; Albert J M Yee; Hans J Kreder; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The impact of incidental durotomy on the outcome of decompression surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data--a Swiss prospective multi-center cohort study.

Authors:  Nils H Ulrich; Jakob M Burgstaller; Florian Brunner; François Porchet; Mazda Farshad; Giuseppe Pichierri; Johann Steurer; Ulrike Held
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Analysis of surgeries for Degenerative lumbarstenosis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Bin Bai; Yuxin Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Radiographic Risk Factors of Reoperation Following Minimally Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Scoliosis and Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Minori Kato; Takashi Namikawa; Akira Matsumura; Sadahiko Konishi; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.