Literature DB >> 11248761

Comparative effects of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS during treatment and after missing two doses.

R H Hernández1, M J Armas-Hernández, J A Chourio, M C Armas-Padilla, L López, M Alvarez, B Pacheco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) measured by office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) during treatment and, after patients have missed two doses.
METHOD: After a single blind run-in 4-week placebo period, 58 patients were randomly allocated to amlodipine (5mg/daily, n=30) or nifedipine GITS (30mg/daily; n=28) in a double-blind, double dummy fashion. Patients received active medication for 4 weeks. Then, to simulate failure of compliance, patients received two single blinded doses of placebo. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was carried out at the end of run-in placebo phase, the first day, the last day of active treatment and up to 72h after the last active dose.
RESULTS: Diastolic blood pressure was controlled in 61.9% patients on amlodipine and 52.9% on nifedipine GITS. Reductions in blood pressure were similar in both groups. ABPM showed significant reduction in blood pressure from the first day in the nifedipine GITS group, while amlodipine group had marginal effect. Peak reduction in systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 26/15mmHg at 5-6h after ingestion of amlodipine tablets. The trough reduction was 22/13mmHg; with a trough-to-peak ratio of 84.61% for systolic and 86.67% for diastolic blood pressure. Peak reduction in systolic/diastolic blood pressure with nifedipine GITS was 19/15mmHg and the trough reduction was 21/17mmHg, giving a trough-to-peak ratio of 100% for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. When patients received placebo after 4 weeks of active treatment, simulating a compliance failure, amlodipine maintained reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure for at least up to 72h after the last active dose, maintaining 57.71% of the effect for systolic blood pressure and 60.00% for diastolic blood pressure. In contrast, nifedipine GITS effect was rapidly lost during this study phase, with a reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure of only 14-16%, 72h after the last active dose.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that amlodipine and nifedipine GITS reduce blood pressure to about the same extent during chronic treatment. In the case of compliance failure, such as missing one or two doses, amlodipine maintained significant and important antihypertensive effect with the trough-to-peak ratio still over 50% 72h after the last active dose. On the other hand, the coverage of nifedipine GITS was limited to about 36h after the last active dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11248761     DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200102000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  7 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy of generic nifedipine versus brand-name amlodipine for hypertension management in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hao-Wei Lee; Chin-Chou Huang; Hsin-Bang Leu; Yenn-Jiang Lin
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.885

2.  Patterns of nonadherence to antihypertensive therapy in primary care.

Authors:  Larissa Grigoryan; Valory N Pavlik; David J Hyman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  A randomized controlled trial on the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS in sustained hypertension.

Authors:  Qi-Fang Huang; Chang-Sheng Sheng; Yan Li; Yu Dou; Mei-Sheng Zheng; Zhi-Ming Zhu; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  All thiazide-like diuretics are not chlorthalidone: putting the ACCOMPLISH study into perspective.

Authors:  Michael E Ernst; Barry L Carter; Jan N Basile
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Sustained blood pressure-lowering effect of aliskiren compared with telmisartan after a single missed dose.

Authors:  Rainer Düsing; Patrick Brunel; InYoung Baek; Fabio Baschiera
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Amlodipine as an antiischemic drug is superior to long acting nitrates.

Authors:  Goran P Koraćević; Sonja S Dakić; Radmila M Veličković-Radovanović; Svetlana R Apostolović; Nebojša H Krstić; Ivan S Tasić; Marija D Zdravković; Nebojša M Antonijević; Goran N Damnjanović; Tomislav L Kostić
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2014-11-03

7.  Magnitude of and Characteristics Associated With the Treatment of Calcium Channel Blocker-Induced Lower-Extremity Edema With Loop Diuretics.

Authors:  Scott Martin Vouri; Xinyi Jiang; Todd M Manini; Laurence M Solberg; Carl Pepine; Daniel C Malone; Almut G Winterstein
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.