I M Lee1, K M Rexrode, N R Cook, C H Hennekens, J E Burin. 1. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA. i-min.lee@channing.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It is biologically plausible for physical activity to decrease breast cancer risk; however, epidemiologic studies have yielded inconsistent findings. We therefore examined physical activity and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Study. METHODS: We assessed physical activity among 39,322 apparently healthy women, aged > or = 45 years, and prospectively followed them for an average of 48 months. Four hundred eleven women developed breast cancer, with 222 positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors. RESULTS: Among all women the multivariate relative risks of all breast cancer associated with < 840, 840-2519, 2520-6299, and > or = 6300 kJ/week expended on recreational activities and stair climbing were 1.00 (referent), 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.40), 0.86 (0.64-1.17), and 0.80 (0.58-1.12), respectively; p-trend = 0.11. However, among postmenopausal women there was a significant inverse trend for all breast cancer; the corresponding relative risks were 1.0 (referent), 0.97 (0.68-1.4), 0.78 (0.54-1.1), and 0.67 (0.44-1.0), respectively; p-trend = 0.03. Physical activity was unrelated to breast cancers positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors either among all or postmenopausal women (p-trend = 0.50 and 0.26, respectively). When we assessed only vigorous recreational activity, requiring > or = 6 METs or multiples of resting metabolic rate, we observed no significant associations with all or steroid hormone receptor positive breast cancer, either among all or postmenospausal women. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that physical activity during middle age and older is not uniformly associated with decreased breast cancer risk. Among postmenopausal women only, higher levels of physical activity may decrease the risk of breast cancer. This study, however, had limited statistical power to detect small effects.
OBJECTIVE: It is biologically plausible for physical activity to decrease breast cancer risk; however, epidemiologic studies have yielded inconsistent findings. We therefore examined physical activity and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Study. METHODS: We assessed physical activity among 39,322 apparently healthy women, aged > or = 45 years, and prospectively followed them for an average of 48 months. Four hundred eleven women developed breast cancer, with 222 positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors. RESULTS: Among all women the multivariate relative risks of all breast cancer associated with < 840, 840-2519, 2520-6299, and > or = 6300 kJ/week expended on recreational activities and stair climbing were 1.00 (referent), 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.40), 0.86 (0.64-1.17), and 0.80 (0.58-1.12), respectively; p-trend = 0.11. However, among postmenopausal women there was a significant inverse trend for all breast cancer; the corresponding relative risks were 1.0 (referent), 0.97 (0.68-1.4), 0.78 (0.54-1.1), and 0.67 (0.44-1.0), respectively; p-trend = 0.03. Physical activity was unrelated to breast cancers positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors either among all or postmenopausal women (p-trend = 0.50 and 0.26, respectively). When we assessed only vigorous recreational activity, requiring > or = 6 METs or multiples of resting metabolic rate, we observed no significant associations with all or steroid hormone receptor positive breast cancer, either among all or postmenospausal women. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that physical activity during middle age and older is not uniformly associated with decreased breast cancer risk. Among postmenopausal women only, higher levels of physical activity may decrease the risk of breast cancer. This study, however, had limited statistical power to detect small effects.
Authors: Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Swann Arp Adams; Charles E Matthews; James R Hebert; Charity G Moore; Joan E Cunningham; Xiou-Oi Shu; Jeanette Fulton; Yutang Gao; Wei Zheng Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: J Brent Peel; Xuemei Sui; Swann A Adams; James R Hébert; James W Hardin; Steven N Blair Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Susan Higginbotham; Zuo-Feng Zhang; I-Min Lee; Nancy R Cook; Julie E Buring; Simin Liu Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Tricia M Peters; Steven C Moore; Gretchen L Gierach; Nicholas J Wareham; Ulf Ekelund; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Michael F Leitzmann Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 4.430