Regulation of digestive performance: a proposed adaptive response.

Among snakes a correlation exists between feeding habits (frequent or infrequent) and the magnitude by which digestive performance is regulated (modest or large). This paper investigates whether the observed regulation of digestive performance is an adaptation to feeding habits and therefore, a product of natural selection. Using data on metabolic and intestinal responses to feeding for amphibians and reptiles, it is attempted to show the selective advantage and independent origin of either modestly or widely regulating gut performance. In an energetic model, snakes that naturally feed frequently on small meals benefit (from lower energy output) from modestly regulating gut performance as opposed to widely regulating gut performance. Likewise, the model suggests an energetic benefit for infrequently-feeding snakes secondary to the wide regulation of gut performance. This benefit is a function of long spans of fasting with a down-regulated gut (thereby incurring a lower standard metabolic rate) and the occasionally incursion of a costly up-regulation of the gut. In a comparison across several distantly-related lineages of amphibians and reptiles, frequently-feeding species all exhibit small postprandial responses in metabolism and intestinal nutrient transport capacities. In contrast, frogs and snakes that routinely fast for long periods independently experience five- to 30-fold increases in metabolism and intestinal performance with feeding. Among amphibians and reptiles the evidence presented supports the hypothesis that the extent by which the gut is regulated is an adaptive trait that evolved with divergence in feeding habits and energy budgets. In finishing, the foundations, caveats, and suggested future tests of this adaptive hypothesis are presented.