Literature DB >> 11243337

On the validity of the superposition principle in dose calculations for intracavitary implants with shielded vaginal colpostats.

J Markman1, J F Williamson, J F Dempsey, D A Low.   

Abstract

Intracavitary vaginal applicators typically incorporate internal shielding to reduce dose to the bladder and rectum. While dose distributions about a single colpostat have been extensively measured and calculated, these studies neglect dosimetric perturbations arising from the contralateral colpostat or the intrauterine tandem. Dosimetric effects of inhomogeneities in brachytherapy is essential for both dose-based implant optimization as well as for a comparison with alternate modalities, such as intensity modulated radiation therapy. We have used Monte Carlo calculations to model dose distributions about both a Fletcher-Suit-Delclos (FSD) low dose-rate system and the microSelectron high dose-rate remote afterloading system. We have evaluated errors, relative to a Monte Carlo simulation based upon a complete applicator system, in superposition calculations based upon both precalculated single shielded applicator dose distributions as well as single unshielded source dose distributions. Errors were largely dominated by the primary photon attenuation, and were largest behind the shields and tandem. For the FSD applicators, applicator superposition showed differences ranging from a mean of 2.6% at high doses (>Manchester Point A dose) to 4.3% at low doses (<Manchester Point A dose) compared to the full geometry simulation. Source-only superposition yielded errors higher than 10% throughout the dose range. For the HDR applicator system, applicator superposition-induced errors ranging from 3.6%-6.3% at high and low doses, respectively. Source superposition caused errors of 5%-11%. These results indicate that precalculated applicator-based dose distributions can provide an excellent approximation of a full geometry Monte Carlo dose calculation for gynecological implants.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11243337     DOI: 10.1118/1.1339224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Localizing intracavitary brachytherapy applicators from cone-beam CT x-ray projections via a novel iterative forward projection matching algorithm.

Authors:  Damodar Pokhrel; Martin J Murphy; Dorin A Todor; Elisabeth Weiss; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Influence of metal of the applicator on the dose distribution during brachytherapy.

Authors:  Chin-Hui Wu; An-Cheng Shiau; Yi-Jen Liao; Hsin-Yu Lin; Yen-Wan Hsueh Liu; Shih-Ming Hsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Independent evaluation of an in-house brachytherapy treatment planning system using simulation, measurement and calculation methods.

Authors:  M A Mosleh Shirazi; R Faghihi; Z Siavashpour; H A Nedaie; S Mehdizadeh; S Sina
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Developing a Treatment Planning Software Based on TG-43U1 Formalism for Cs-137 LDR Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Sedigheh Sina; Reza Faghihi; Ali Soleimani Meigooni; Zahra Siavashpour; Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 5.  Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: analysis guidelines of GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM.

Authors:  Christian Kirisits; Mark J Rivard; Dimos Baltas; Facundo Ballester; Marisol De Brabandere; Rob van der Laarse; Yury Niatsetski; Panagiotis Papagiannis; Taran Paulsen Hellebust; Jose Perez-Calatayud; Kari Tanderup; Jack L M Venselaar; Frank-André Siebert
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Impact of the vaginal applicator and dummy pellets on the dosimetry parameters of Cs-137 brachytherapy source.

Authors:  Sedigheh Sina; Reza Faghihi; Ali S Meigooni; Simin Mehdizadeh; M Amin Mosleh Shirazi; Mehdi Zehtabian
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.