Literature DB >> 11242482

Second meal effect: modified sham feeding does not provoke the release of stored triacylglycerol from a previous high-fat meal.

K G Jackson1, M D Robertson, B A Fielding, K N Frayn, C M Williams.   

Abstract

The present study was carried out to determine whether cephalic stimulation, associated with eating a meal, was sufficient stimulus to provoke the release of stored triacylglycerol (TAG) from a previous high-fat meal. Ten subjects were studied on three separate occasions. Following a 12 h overnight fast, subjects were given a standard mixed test meal which contained 56 g fat. Blood samples were taken before the meal and for 5 h after the meal when the subjects were randomly allocated to receive either water (control) or were modified sham fed a low-fat (6 g fat) or moderate-fat (38 g fat) meal. Blood samples were collected for a further 3 h. Compared with the control, modified sham feeding a low- or moderate-fat meal did not provoke an early entry of TAG, analysed in either plasma or TAG-rich lipoprotein (TRL) fraction (density <1.006 kg/l). The TRL-retinyl ester data showed similar findings. A cephalic phase secretion of pancreatic polypeptide, without a significant increase in cholecystokinin levels, was observed on modified sham feeding. Although these data indicate that modified sham feeding was carried out successfully, analysis of the fat content of the expectorant showed that our subjects may have accidentally ingested a small amount of fat (0.7 g for the low-fat meal and 2.4 g for the moderate-fat meal). Nevertheless, an early TAG peak following modified sham feeding was not demonstrated in the present study, suggesting that significant ingestion of food, and not just oro-sensory stimulation, is necessary to provoke the release of any TAG stored from a previous meal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11242482     DOI: 10.1079/bjn2000226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  8 in total

1.  Meal ingestion provokes entry of lipoproteins containing fat from the previous meal: possible metabolic implications.

Authors:  K D Renuka R Silva; John W Wright; Christine M Williams; Julie A Lovegrove
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 2.  Is there a fatty acid taste?

Authors:  Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.848

3.  Introduction to the DISRUPT postprandial database: subjects, studies and methodologies.

Authors:  Kim G Jackson; Dave T Clarke; Peter Murray; Julie A Lovegrove; Brendan O'Malley; Anne M Minihane; Christine M Williams
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.523

4.  Dynamics of fat absorption and effect of sham feeding on postprandial lipema.

Authors:  Rosa N Chavez-Jauregui; Richard D Mattes; Elizabeth J Parks
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Measurement of lipid flux to advance translational research: evolution of classic methods to the future of precision health.

Authors:  Amadeo F Salvador; Chi-Ren Shyu; Elizabeth J Parks
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 12.153

6.  Impact of Sequential Lipid Meals on Lymphatic Lipid Absorption and Transport in Rats.

Authors:  Qi Zhu; Qing Yang; Ling Shen; Jie Qu; Meifeng Xu; David Q-H Wang; Patrick Tso; Min Liu
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Mobilisation of enterocyte fat stores by oral glucose in humans.

Authors:  M D Robertson; M Parkes; B F Warren; D J P Ferguson; K G Jackson; D P Jewell; K N Frayn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Human intestinal lipid storage through sequential meals reveals faster dinner appearance is associated with hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  Miriam Jacome-Sosa; Qiong Hu; Camila M Manrique-Acevedo; Robert D Phair; Elizabeth J Parks
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-08-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.