Literature DB >> 11241703

Noise correction for the exact determination of apparent diffusion coefficients at low SNR.

O Dietrich1, S Heiland, K Sartor.   

Abstract

Noise in MR image data increases the mean signal intensity of image regions due to the usually performed magnitude reconstruction. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is especially affected by high noise levels for several reasons, and a decreasing SNR at increasing diffusion weighting causes systematic errors when calculating apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs). Two different methods are presented to correct biased signal intensities due to the presence of complex noise: 1) with Gaussian intensity distribution, and 2) with arbitrary intensity distribution. The performance of the correction schemes is demonstrated by numerical simulations and DWI measurements on two different MR systems with different noise characteristics. These experiments show that noise significantly influences the determination of ADCs. Applying the proposed correction schemes reduced the bias of the determined ADC to less than 10% of the bias without correction. Magn Reson Med 45:448-453, 2001. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11241703     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2594(200103)45:3<448::aid-mrm1059>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  42 in total

1.  MR spectroscopic findings in a case of Alpers-Huttenlocher syndrome.

Authors:  Katharina Flemming; Stefan Ulmer; Barbara Duisberg; Andreas Hahn; Olav Jansen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and geometric distortion on a 0.35T MR-LINAC at multiple gantry angles.

Authors:  Benjamin Lewis; Anamaria Guta; Stacie Mackey; H Michael Gach; Sasa Mutic; Olga Green; Taeho Kim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: field strength related variance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) scalars.

Authors:  Thierry A G M Huisman; Thomas Loenneker; Gerd Barta; Matthias E Bellemann; Juergen Hennig; Joachim E Fischer; Kamil A Il'yasov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Examination of spinal cord tissue architecture with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  COmplex-Model-Based Estimation of thermal noise for fMRI data in the presence of artifacts.

Authors:  Yin Xu; Gaohong Wu; Daniel B Rowe; Yuan Ma; Rongyan Zhang; Guofan Xu; Shi-Jiang Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  How background noise shifts eigenvectors and increases eigenvalues in DTI.

Authors:  Frederik Bernd Laun; Lothar Rudi Schad; Jan Klein; Bram Stieltjes
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Assessment of bias in experimentally measured diffusion tensor imaging parameters using SIMEX.

Authors:  Carolyn B Lauzon; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Brian C Caffo; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Sensitivity-enhanced chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI with least squares optimization of Carr Purcell Meiboom Gill multi-echo echo planar imaging.

Authors:  Phillip Zhe Sun; Yu Wang; Jie Lu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Effects of image noise in muscle diffusion tensor (DT)-MRI assessed using numerical simulations.

Authors:  Bruce M Damon
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Normal hepatic parenchyma visibility and ADC quantification on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T: influence of age, gender, and iron content.

Authors:  Thierry Metens; Kellen Fanstone Ferraresi; Alessandra Farchione; Christophe Moreno; Maria Antonietta Bali; Celso Matos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.