Literature DB >> 11241545

Use of videotapes for viewing at home to inform choice in Down syndrome screening: a randomised controlled trial.

J Hewison1, H Cuckle, C Baillie, I Sehmi, S Lindow, F Jackson, J Batty.   

Abstract

A randomised trial was carried out to assess the effect of a Down syndrome screening video on test uptake, knowledge and psychological stress. A total of 2000 women referred for antenatal care were allocated to two equal groups: one to be sent a video to their home, before their hospital booking visit, and a control group. All women also received screening information in the form of a leaflet before booking and from a midwife at booking. The video had no effect on the screening uptake rate: 638/993 (64.2%) and 652/1007 (64.7%) in the video and control groups, respectively. Women were requested to return the video for reuse in other pregnancies and 612 (62%) did so. A subset of 1200 women were selected to be posted at 17-19 weeks' gestation a self-completed questionnaire to assess the psychological endpoints. Knowledge of screening was increased in the video group with a mean score of 7.3 compared with 6.7 in the controls, a statistically significant difference (t=3.24, p=0.0005). There were no significant differences between the groups in specific worries about abnormalities in the baby, and general anxiety. We conclude that a video can increase knowledge without affecting the uptake of the test, or psychological stress. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11241545     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0223(200102)21:2<146::aid-pd3>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  11 in total

1.  Informing children and parents about research.

Authors:  A Dawson; S A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  The impact of an educational pamphlet on knowledge and anxiety in women with preeclampsia.

Authors:  Nadine Sauvé; Raymond O Powrie; Lucia Larson; Maureen G Phipps; Sherry Weitzen; Donna Fitzpatrick; Karen Rosene-Montella
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2008-09-01

3.  Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Information Film on Informed Decision-making: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mamta Ruparel; Samantha L Quaife; Bhagabati Ghimire; Jennifer L Dickson; Angshu Bhowmik; Neal Navani; David R Baldwin; Stephen Duffy; Jo Waller; Sam M Janes
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-06

Review 4.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Grace Ames; Sylvia Ann Metcalfe; Alison Dalton Archibald; Rony Emily Duncan; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lean Beulen; Michelle van den Berg; Brigitte Hw Faas; Ilse Feenstra; Michiel Hageman; John Mg van Vugt; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  A systematic review of information in decision aids.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kathryn McIssac; Joan Austoker; Agathe Charvet; Paul Hewitson; Karen R Sepucha; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Influence of Prenatal Counseling on the Attitudes and Preferences Toward Invasive Prenatal Testing Among Women in Their First Trimester of Pregnancy (INVASIVE).

Authors:  Fernanda Paz Y Miño; Raigam Jafet Martinez-Portilla; Montse Pauta; Antoni Borrell
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics.

Authors:  Rebecca Say; Stephen Robson; Richard Thomson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Effect of Shared Decision-making on Anxiety of Women Recommended for Prenatal Screening Tests in Southeast of Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Moudi; Raheleh Jam; Hossein Ansari; Mostafa Montazer Zohour
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2020-09

10.  A comparison of face to face and group education on informed choice and decisional conflict of pregnant women about screening tests of fetal abnormalities.

Authors:  Masoumeh Kordi; Sahar Riyazi; Marziyeh Lotfalizade; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri; Hoseyn Jafari Suny
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.