Literature DB >> 11239757

CA27.29: a valuable marker for breast cancer management. A confirmatory multicentric study on 603 cases.

M Gion1, R Mione, A E Leon, D Lüftner, R Molina, K Possinger, J F Robertson.   

Abstract

Recently, a fully automated method has become commercially available to measure the MUC-1-associated antigen CA27.29. The present investigation was performed in order to compare CA27.29 and CA15.3 in a wide series of patients affected with breast cancer. Overall, 603 cases with breast cancer and 194 healthy controls were investigated. Patients were enrolled in 4 institutions, while assays were performed in one laboratory. CA27.29 was measured by the ACS:180 BR assay (Bayer Diagnostics) and CA15.3 by the AxSYM (Abbott Laboratories). An excellent correlation was found between the results obtained by the two methods. The two markers showed comparable results in healthy controls, with higher levels in post-menopausal than in pre-menopausal subjects. The markers were significantly higher in primary breast cancer than in controls. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of the two tests were comparable, but CA27.29 showed better sensitivity in cases with low antigen concentrations (below the cut-off point). Accordingly, when comparing each test in different stage categories, significance levels of the differences were higher for CA27.29 than for CA15.3 for all T categories versus healthy controls, for pT1 versus pT2, for all N categories versus healthy controls and for node-negative versus N1-3 patients. From the results of the present study, that has been performed on samples taken at diagnosis and prior to any treatment from the widest series of patients with primary breast cancer reported so far, we can draw the following conclusions: CA27.29 provides comparable results to CA15.3; CA27.29 seems more sensitive than CA15.3 to limited variations of tumour extension; however, it cannot help clinicians in distinguishing stage I patients from stage II patients. However, from the point of view of clinical decision making, CA27.29 provides comparable results to CA15.3. CA27.29 is therefore suitable for routine use in the management of patients with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11239757     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00396-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  16 in total

Review 1.  Glycoprotein disease markers and single protein-omics.

Authors:  Kevin Chandler; Radoslav Goldman
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  CA27.29 as a tumour marker for risk evaluation and therapy monitoring in primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Brigitte Rack; Julia Jückstock; Elisabeth Trapp; Tobias Weissenbacher; Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni; Amelie Schramm; Peter Widschwendter; Krisztian Lato; Thomas Zwingers; Ralf Lorenz; Hans Tesch; Andreas Schneeweiss; Peter Fasching; Sven Mahner; Matthias W Beckmann; Werner Lichtenegger; Wolfgang Janni
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-08-01

3.  BORIS, brother of the regulator of imprinted sites, is aberrantly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kefei Chen; Wenqing Huang; Bin Huang; YongGang Wei; Bo Li; Yan Ge; Yang Qin
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-12-13

Review 4.  A Phenomic Perspective on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Treatment: Integrating Aging and Lifestyle in Blood and Tissue Biomarker Profiling.

Authors:  Ainhoa Arana Echarri; Mark Beresford; John P Campbell; Robert H Jones; Rachel Butler; Kenneth J Gollob; Patricia C Brum; Dylan Thompson; James E Turner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Up-regulated proteins in the fluid bathing the tumour cell microenvironment as potential serological markers for early detection of cancer of the breast.

Authors:  Pavel Gromov; Irina Gromova; Jakob Bunkenborg; Teresa Cabezon; José M A Moreira; Vera Timmermans-Wielenga; Peter Roepstorff; Fritz Rank; Julio E Celis
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 6.  Breast cancer follow-up in the adjuvant setting.

Authors:  James Khatcheressian; Craig Swainey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Long-term prognostic study of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) in breast cancer.

Authors:  Masahiro Uehara; Takayuki Kinoshita; Takashi Hojo; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Eriko Iwamoto; Takashi Fukutomi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Circulating tumour markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ettore Seregni; Antonio Coli; Nicola Mazzucca
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin protein as a biomarker in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Tingting Zeng
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2013-03-27

10.  The multiplex bead array approach to identifying serum biomarkers associated with breast cancer.

Authors:  Byoung Kwon Kim; Jong Won Lee; Pil Je Park; Yong Sung Shin; Won Young Lee; Kyung Ae Lee; Sena Ye; Heesun Hyun; Kyung Nam Kang; Donghwa Yeo; Youngdai Kim; Sung Yup Ohn; Dong Young Noh; Chul Woo Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.