Literature DB >> 11239278

Mobility status after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: 1-year follow-up and prognostic factors.

S Paolucci1, M G Grasso, G Antonucci, M Bragoni, E Troisi, D Morelli, P Coiro, D De Angelis, F Rizzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the stability of mobility status achieved by stroke patients during hospital rehabilitation treatment over time and to identify reliable prognostic factors associated with mobility changes.
DESIGN: Follow-up evaluation in consecutive first-ever stroke patients 1 year after hospital discharge. Multiple logistic regressions were used to analyze increases and decreases in Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) scores (dependent variables) between discharge and follow-up. Independent variables were medical, demographic, and social factors.
SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. PATIENTS: A cohort of 155 patients with sequelae of first stroke, with a final sample of 141. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mobility status at 1-year follow-up, as measured by the RMI, and odds ratios (OR) for improvement and decline in mobility.
RESULTS: Functionally, 19.9% improved the mobility levels achieved during the inpatient rehabilitation treatment; levels of 42.6% worsened. Patients with global aphasia (OR = 5.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-21.33), unilateral neglect (OR = 3.01; 95% CI, 1.21-7.50), and age 75 years or older (OR = 5.77; 95% CI, 1.42-23.34) had a higher probability of mobility decline than the remaining patients. Postdischarge rehabilitation treatment (PDT), received by 52.5% of the final sample, was significantly and positively associated with mobility improvement (OR = 5.86; 95% CI, 2.02-17.00). Absence of PDT was associated with a decline in mobility (OR = 3.73; 95% CI, 1.73-8.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In most cases, mobility status had not yet stabilized at hospital discharge. PDT was useful in preventing a deterioration in mobility improvement achieved during inpatient treatment and in helping increase the likelihood of further mobility improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11239278     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  12 in total

1.  Predictors of response to treadmill exercise in stroke survivors.

Authors:  Judith M Lam; Christoph Globas; Joachim Cerny; Benjamin Hertler; Kamil Uludag; Larry W Forrester; Richard F Macko; Daniel F Hanley; Clemens Becker; Andreas R Luft
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Application of the Sit-Up Test for orthostatic hypotension in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Ada Tang; Janice J Eng; Andrei Krassioukov
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.145

3.  A step activity monitoring program improves real world walking activity post stroke.

Authors:  Kelly A Danks; Margaret A Roos; Dana McCoy; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Non-motor Factors Associated with the Attainment of Community Ambulation after Stroke.

Authors:  Milene Silva Ferreira; Therezinha Rosane Chamlian; Carolina Nunes França; Ayrton Roberto Massaro
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-11-07

5.  Home-based telerehabilitation shows improved upper limb function in adults with chronic stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jeanne Langan; Kelsey Delave; Lauren Phillips; Percival Pangilinan; Susan H Brown
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Peripheral Prisms Improve Obstacle Detection during Simulated Walking for Patients with Left Hemispatial Neglect and Hemianopia.

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; Alex R Bowers; Eli Peli; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  A behavioral analysis of spatial neglect and its recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Jennifer Rengachary; Biyu J He; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  180° turn while walking: characterization and comparisons between subjects with and without stroke.

Authors:  Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria; Bárbara Paula de Carvalho-Pinto; Sylvie Nadeau; Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-10-28

9.  Testing of a 3D printed hand exoskeleton for an individual with stroke: a case study.

Authors:  Drew R Dudley; Brian A Knarr; Ka-Chun Siu; Jean Peck; Brian Ricks; Jorge M Zuniga
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2019-08-06

10.  Different cutoff values for 10-m walking speed simply classification of walking independence in stroke patients with or without cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Yoshimoto; Yukitsuna Oyama; Mamoru Tanaka
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.