Literature DB >> 11238495

Effect of alendronate and MK-677 (a growth hormone secretagogue), individually and in combination, on markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

M G Murphy1, S Weiss, M McClung, T Schnitzer, K Cerchio, J Connor, D Krupa, B J Gertz.   

Abstract

GH increases bone turnover and stimulates osteoblast activity. We hypothesized that administration of MK-677, an orally active GH secretagogue, together with alendronate, a potent inhibitor of bone resorption, would maintain a higher bone formation rate relative to that seen with alendronate alone, thereby generating greater enhancement of bone mineral density (BMD) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. We determined the individual and combined effects of MK-677 and alendronate administration on insulin-like growth factor I levels and biochemical markers of bone formation (osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) and resorption [urinary N-telopeptide cross-links (NTx)] for 12 months and BMD for 18 months. In a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, 18-month study, 292 women (64-85 yr old) with low femoral neck BMD were randomly assigned in a 3:3:1:1 ratio to 1 of 4 daily treatment groups for 12 months: MK-677 (25 mg) plus alendronate (10 mg); alendronate (10 mg); MK-677 (25 mg); or a double dummy placebo. Patients who received MK-677 alone or placebo through month 12 received MK-677 (25 mg) plus alendronate (10 mg) from months 12-18. All other patients remained on their assigned therapy. All patients received 500 mg/day calcium. The primary results, except for BMD, are provided for month 12. MK-677, with or without alendronate, increased insulin-like growth factor I levels from baseline (39% and 45%; P < 0.05 vs. placebo). MK-677 increased osteocalcin and urinary NTx by 22% and 41%, on the average, respectively (P < 0.05 vs. placebo). MK-677 and alendronate mitigated the reduction in bone formation compared with alendronate alone based on mean relative changes in serum osteocalcin (-40% vs. -54%; P < 0.05, combination vs. alendronate) and reduced the effect of alendronate on resorption (NTx) as well (-52% vs. -61%; P < 0.05, combination vs. alendronate). MK-677 plus alendronate increased BMD at the femoral neck (4.2% vs. 2.5% for alendronate; P < 0.05). However, similar enhancement was not seen with MK-677 plus alendronate in BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, or total body compared with alendronate alone. GH-mediated side effects were noted in the groups receiving MK-677, although adverse events resulting in discontinuation from the study were relatively infrequent. In conclusion, the anabolic effect of GH, as produced through the GH secretagogue MK-677, attenuated the indirect suppressive effect of alendronate on bone formation, but did not translate into significant increases in BMD at sites other than the femoral neck. Although the femoral neck is an important site for fracture prevention, the lack of enhancement in bone mass at other sites compared with that seen with alendronate alone is a concern when weighed against the potential side effects of enhanced GH secretion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11238495     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.86.3.7294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  23 in total

1.  Tandem mass spectrum of a growth hormone secretagogue: amide bond cleavage and resultant gas-phase rearrangement.

Authors:  Xue-Zhi Qin
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Deletion of ghrelin impairs neither growth nor appetite.

Authors:  Yuxiang Sun; Saira Ahmed; Roy G Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Agonism, Antagonism, and Inverse Agonism Bias at the Ghrelin Receptor Signaling.

Authors:  Céline M'Kadmi; Jean-Philippe Leyris; Lauriane Onfroy; Céline Galés; Aude Saulière; Didier Gagne; Marjorie Damian; Sophie Mary; Mathieu Maingot; Séverine Denoyelle; Pascal Verdié; Jean-Alain Fehrentz; Jean Martinez; Jean-Louis Banères; Jacky Marie
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Combination therapy for osteoporosis: considerations and controversy.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Diane Krueger
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Combination therapy for osteoporosis: considerations and controversy.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Diane Krueger
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  The Safety and Efficacy of Growth Hormone Secretagogues.

Authors:  John T Sigalos; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2017-04-08

Review 7.  Alendronate: an update of its use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Sharpe; S Noble; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Tadrous; L Wong; M M Mamdani; D N Juurlink; M D Krahn; L E Lévesque; S M Cadarette
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Growth hormone in musculoskeletal pain states.

Authors:  Robert Bennett
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Effects of an oral ghrelin mimetic on body composition and clinical outcomes in healthy older adults: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ralf Nass; Suzan S Pezzoli; Mary Clancy Oliveri; James T Patrie; Frank E Harrell; Jody L Clasey; Steven B Heymsfield; Mark A Bach; Mary Lee Vance; Michael O Thorner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.