John T Sigalos1, Alexander W Pastuszak2. 1. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: pastusza@bcm.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Growth hormone (GH) increases lean body mass, decreases fat mass, increases exercise tolerance and maximum oxygen uptake, enhances muscle strength, and improves linear growth. Long-term studies of GH administration offer conflicting results on its safety, which has led to strict Food and Drug Administration criteria for GH use. The potential drawbacks of exogenous GH use are believed to be due in part to impaired regulatory feedback. AIM: To review the literature on GH secretagogues (GHSs), which include GH-releasing peptides and the orally available small-molecule drug ibutamoren mesylate. METHODS: Review of clinical studies on the safety and efficacy of GHSs in human subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Report on the physiologic changes from GHS use in human subjects including its safety profile. RESULTS: GHSs promote pulsatile release of GH that is subject to negative feedback and can prevent supra-therapeutic levels of GH and their sequelae. To date, few long-term, rigorously controlled studies have examined the efficacy and safety of GHSs, although GHSs might improve growth velocity in children, stimulate appetite, improve lean mass in wasting states and in obese individuals, decrease bone turnover, increase fat-free mass, and improve sleep. Available studies indicate that GHSs are well tolerated, with some concern for increases in blood glucose because of decreases in insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Further work is needed to better understand the long-term impact of GHSs on human anatomy and physiology and more specifically in the context of a diversity of clinical scenarios. Furthermore, the safety of these compounds with long-term use, including evaluation of cancer incidence and mortality, is needed. Sigalos JT, Pastuszak AW. The Safety and Efficacy of Growth Hormone Secretagogues. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:45-53.
INTRODUCTION:Growth hormone (GH) increases lean body mass, decreases fat mass, increases exercise tolerance and maximum oxygen uptake, enhances muscle strength, and improves linear growth. Long-term studies of GH administration offer conflicting results on its safety, which has led to strict Food and Drug Administration criteria for GH use. The potential drawbacks of exogenous GH use are believed to be due in part to impaired regulatory feedback. AIM: To review the literature on GH secretagogues (GHSs), which include GH-releasing peptides and the orally available small-molecule drug ibutamoren mesylate. METHODS: Review of clinical studies on the safety and efficacy of GHSs in human subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Report on the physiologic changes from GHS use in human subjects including its safety profile. RESULTS:GHSs promote pulsatile release of GH that is subject to negative feedback and can prevent supra-therapeutic levels of GH and their sequelae. To date, few long-term, rigorously controlled studies have examined the efficacy and safety of GHSs, althoughGHSs might improve growth velocity in children, stimulate appetite, improve lean mass in wasting states and in obese individuals, decrease bone turnover, increase fat-free mass, and improve sleep. Available studies indicate that GHSs are well tolerated, with some concern for increases in blood glucose because of decreases in insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Further work is needed to better understand the long-term impact of GHSs on human anatomy and physiology and more specifically in the context of a diversity of clinical scenarios. Furthermore, the safety of these compounds with long-term use, including evaluation of cancer incidence and mortality, is needed. Sigalos JT, Pastuszak AW. The Safety and Efficacy of Growth Hormone Secretagogues. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:45-53.
Authors: G Copinschi; R Leproult; A Van Onderbergen; A Caufriez; K Y Cole; L M Schilling; C M Mendel; I De Lepeleire; J A Bolognese; E Van Cauter Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: E Codner; F Cassorla; A N Tiulpakov; M V Mericq; A Avila; O H Pescovitz; J Svensson; K Cerchio; D Krupa; B J Gertz; G Murphy Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M G Murphy; M A Bach; D Plotkin; J Bolognese; J Ng; D Krupa; K Cerchio; B J Gertz Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: J A Aloi; B J Gertz; M L Hartman; W C Huhn; S S Pezzoli; J M Wittreich; D A Krupa; M O Thorner Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: A A Patchett; R P Nargund; J R Tata; M H Chen; K J Barakat; D B Johnston; K Cheng; W W Chan; B Butler; G Hickey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-07-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Chad M Kerksick; Colin D Wilborn; Michael D Roberts; Abbie Smith-Ryan; Susan M Kleiner; Ralf Jäger; Rick Collins; Mathew Cooke; Jaci N Davis; Elfego Galvan; Mike Greenwood; Lonnie M Lowery; Robert Wildman; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Deepankar K Sinha; Adithya Balasubramanian; Alexander J Tatem; Jorge Rivera-Mirabal; Justin Yu; Jason Kovac; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2020-03