Literature DB >> 11238177

Rates of base excision repair are not solely dependent on levels of initiating enzymes.

E Cappelli1, T Hazra, J W Hill, G Slupphaug, M Bogliolo, G Frosina.   

Abstract

The oxidized base 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), the product of deamination of cytosine uracil (U), and the sites of base loss [abasic (AP) sites] are among the most frequent mutagenic lesions formed in the human genome under physiological conditions. In human cells, the enzymatic activities initiating DNA base excision repair (BER) of 8-oxoG, U and AP sites are the 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase (hOGG1), the U-DNA glycosylase (UNG) and the major hydrolytic AP endonuclease (APE/HAP1), respectively. In recent work, we observed that BER of the three lesions occurs in human cell extracts with different efficacy. In particular, 8-oxoG is repaired on average 4-fold less efficiently than U, which, in turn, is repaired 7-fold slower than the natural AP site. To discriminate whether the different rates of repair may be linked to different expression of the initiating enzymes, we have determined the amount of hOGG1, UNG and APE/HAP1 in normal human cell extracts by immunodetection techniques. Our results show that a single human fibroblast contains 123 000 +/- 22 000 hOGG1 molecules, 178 000 +/- 20 000 UNG molecules and 297 000 +/- 50 000 APE/HAP1 molecules. These limited differences in enzyme expression levels cannot readily explain the different rates at which the three lesions are repaired in vitro. Addition to reaction mixtures of titrated amounts of purified hOGG1, UNG and APE/HAP1 variably stimulated the in vitro repair replication of 8-oxoG, U and the AP site respectively and the increase was not always proportional to the amount of added enzyme. We conclude that the rates of BER depend only in part on cellular levels of initiating enzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11238177     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/22.3.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  18 in total

Review 1.  Clustered DNA lesion repair in eukaryotes: relevance to mutagenesis and cell survival.

Authors:  Evelyne Sage; Lynn Harrison
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Processing of abasic DNA clusters in hApeI-silenced primary fibroblasts exposed to low doses of X-irradiation.

Authors:  Prolay Das; Betsy M Sutherland
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase in base excision repair and adaptive immunity: species differences between man and mouse.

Authors:  Berit Doseth; Torkild Visnes; Anders Wallenius; Ida Ericsson; Antonio Sarno; Henrik Sahlin Pettersen; Arnar Flatberg; Tara Catterall; Geir Slupphaug; Hans E Krokan; Bodil Kavli
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Detection of damaged DNA bases by DNA glycosylase enzymes.

Authors:  Joshua I Friedman; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Limited repair of 8-hydroxy-7,8-dihydroguanine residues in human testicular cells.

Authors:  Ann-Karin Olsen; Nur Duale; Magnar Bjørås; Cathrine T Larsen; Richard Wiger; Jørn A Holme; Erling C Seeberg; Gunnar Brunborg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A base-excision DNA-repair protein finds intrahelical lesion bases by fast sliding in contact with DNA.

Authors:  Paul C Blainey; Antoine M van Oijen; Anirban Banerjee; Gregory L Verdine; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Microscopic mechanism of DNA damage searching by hOGG1.

Authors:  Meng M Rowland; Joseph D Schonhoft; Paige L McKibbin; Sheila S David; James T Stivers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase employs a processive search for DNA damage.

Authors:  Mark Hedglin; Patrick J O'Brien
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 9.  Facilitated Diffusion Mechanisms in DNA Base Excision Repair and Transcriptional Activation.

Authors:  Alexandre Esadze; James T Stivers
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Developing an in silico model of the modulation of base excision repair using methoxyamine for more targeted cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Evren Gurkan-Cavusoglu; Sriya Avadhani; Lili Liu; Timothy J Kinsella; Kenneth A Loparo
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.