M V Gamble1, R Ramakrishnan, N A Palafox, K Briand, L Berglund, W S Blaner. 1. Institute of Human Nutrition and the Departments of Medicine and of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA. mgamble3@ix.netcom.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serum retinol is transported by retinol binding protein (RBP), which has one high-affinity binding site for retinol; consequently, the molar ratio of retinol to RBP in the circulation is approximately 1 to 1. In vitamin A deficiency (VAD), both serum retinol and RBP decline. However, the retinol-RBP relation has not been well studied in populations with a high incidence of severe VAD. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether RBP is a good surrogate for serum retinol at the very low retinol concentrations encountered in VAD. DESIGN: The stoichiometric relation between retinol and RBP was studied in 239 Marshallese children: 65 with severe VAD (< or = 0.35 micromol retinol/L), 94 with moderate VAD (0.36-0.70 micromol retinol/L), and 80 with vitamin A sufficiency (> 0.70 micromol retinol/L). RESULTS: Excellent correlation between retinol and RBP (r = 0.94) was observed across all retinol concentrations. Severe VAD was predicted with 96% sensitivity and 91% specificity on the basis of an RBP cutoff of < or = 0.48 micromol/L, whereas moderate VAD was predicted with 87% sensitivity and 98% specificity on the basis of an RBP cutoff of < or = 0.70 micromol/L. CONCLUSIONS: The use of RBP results in the classification of essentially the same children with VAD as does retinol, and RBP is an excellent surrogate for serum retinol. Considering the relative ease of measuring RBP with immunodiagnostic kits compared with that of serum retinol by HPLC, the use of RBP concentrations to assess VAD may be particularly advantageous in field settings. Consequently, measuring RBP concentrations may be a practical alternative to measuring serum retinol in population surveys assessing the prevalence of VAD.
BACKGROUND: Serum retinol is transported by retinol binding protein (RBP), which has one high-affinity binding site for retinol; consequently, the molar ratio of retinol to RBP in the circulation is approximately 1 to 1. In vitamin A deficiency (VAD), both serum retinol and RBP decline. However, the retinol-RBP relation has not been well studied in populations with a high incidence of severe VAD. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether RBP is a good surrogate for serum retinol at the very low retinol concentrations encountered in VAD. DESIGN: The stoichiometric relation between retinol and RBP was studied in 239 Marshallese children: 65 with severe VAD (< or = 0.35 micromol retinol/L), 94 with moderate VAD (0.36-0.70 micromol retinol/L), and 80 with vitamin A sufficiency (> 0.70 micromol retinol/L). RESULTS: Excellent correlation between retinol and RBP (r = 0.94) was observed across all retinol concentrations. Severe VAD was predicted with 96% sensitivity and 91% specificity on the basis of an RBP cutoff of < or = 0.48 micromol/L, whereas moderate VAD was predicted with 87% sensitivity and 98% specificity on the basis of an RBP cutoff of < or = 0.70 micromol/L. CONCLUSIONS: The use of RBP results in the classification of essentially the same children with VAD as does retinol, and RBP is an excellent surrogate for serum retinol. Considering the relative ease of measuring RBP with immunodiagnostic kits compared with that of serum retinol by HPLC, the use of RBP concentrations to assess VAD may be particularly advantageous in field settings. Consequently, measuring RBP concentrations may be a practical alternative to measuring serum retinol in population surveys assessing the prevalence of VAD.
Authors: Qin Yang; Iratxe Eskurza; Urban A Kiernan; David A Phillips; Matthias Blüher; Timothy E Graham; Barbara B Kahn Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Adam R Aluisio; Shiromi M Perera; Derrick Yam; Stephanie Garbern; Jillian L Peters; Logan Abel; Daniel K Cho; Stephen B Kennedy; Moses Massaquoi; Foday Sahr; Suzanne Brinkmann; Lindsey Locks; Tao Liu; Adam C Levine Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Heather Greenlee; Ann Ogden Gaffney; A Corina Aycinena; Pam Koch; Isobel Contento; Wahida Karmally; John M Richardson; Zaixing Shi; Emerson Lim; Wei-Yann Tsai; Regina M Santella; William S Blaner; Robin D Clugston; Serge Cremers; Susan Pollak; Iryna Sirosh; Katherine D Crew; Matthew Maurer; Kevin Kalinsky; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Sant-Rayn Pasricha; Varalaxmi Vijaykumar; N S Prashanth; H Sudarshan; Beverley-Ann Biggs; Jim Black; Arun Shet Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 3.295