BACKGROUND: A high dietary fat intake is involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the effect of different amounts of dietary fat on hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity. DESIGN: Six healthy men were studied on 3 occasions after consuming for 11 d diets with identical energy and protein contents but different percentages of energy as fat and carbohydrate as follows: 0% and 85% [low-fat, high-carbohydrate (LFHC) diet], 41% and 44% [intermediate-fat, intermediate-carbohydrate (IFIC) diet], and 83% and 2% [high-fat, low-carbohydrate (HFLC) diet]. Insulin sensitivity was quantified by using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (plasma insulin concentration: approximately 190 pmol/L). RESULTS: During hyperinsulinemia, endogenous glucose production was higher after the HFLC diet (2.5 +/- 0.3 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.05) than after the IFIC and LFHC diets (1.7 +/- 0.3 and 1.2 +/- 0.4 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively). The ratio of dietary fat to carbohydrate had no unequivocal effects on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. In contrast, insulin-stimulated, nonoxidative glucose disposal tended to increase in relation to an increase in the ratio of fat to carbohydrate, from 14.8 +/- 5.1 to 20.6 +/- 1.9 to 26.2 +/- 2.9 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) (P < 0.074 between the 3 diets). Insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation was significantly lower after the HFLC diet than after the IFIC and LFHC diets: 1.7 +/- 0.8 compared with 13.4 +/- 2.1 and 19.0 +/- 2.1 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively (P < 0.05). During the clamp study, plasma fatty acid concentrations were higher after the HFLC diet than after the IFIC and LFHC diets: 0.22 +/- 0.02 compared with 0.07 +/- 0.01 and 0.05 +/- 0.01 mmol/L, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A high-fat, low-carbohydrate intake reduces the ability of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production and alters the relation between oxidative and nonoxidative glucose disposal in a way that favors storage of glucose.
BACKGROUND: A high dietary fat intake is involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the effect of different amounts of dietary fat on hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity. DESIGN: Six healthy men were studied on 3 occasions after consuming for 11 d diets with identical energy and protein contents but different percentages of energy as fat and carbohydrate as follows: 0% and 85% [low-fat, high-carbohydrate (LFHC) diet], 41% and 44% [intermediate-fat, intermediate-carbohydrate (IFIC) diet], and 83% and 2% [high-fat, low-carbohydrate (HFLC) diet]. Insulin sensitivity was quantified by using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (plasma insulin concentration: approximately 190 pmol/L). RESULTS: During hyperinsulinemia, endogenous glucose production was higher after the HFLC diet (2.5 +/- 0.3 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.05) than after the IFIC and LFHC diets (1.7 +/- 0.3 and 1.2 +/- 0.4 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively). The ratio of dietary fat to carbohydrate had no unequivocal effects on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. In contrast, insulin-stimulated, nonoxidative glucose disposal tended to increase in relation to an increase in the ratio of fat to carbohydrate, from 14.8 +/- 5.1 to 20.6 +/- 1.9 to 26.2 +/- 2.9 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) (P < 0.074 between the 3 diets). Insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation was significantly lower after the HFLC diet than after the IFIC and LFHC diets: 1.7 +/- 0.8 compared with 13.4 +/- 2.1 and 19.0 +/- 2.1 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively (P < 0.05). During the clamp study, plasma fatty acid concentrations were higher after the HFLC diet than after the IFIC and LFHC diets: 0.22 +/- 0.02 compared with 0.07 +/- 0.01 and 0.05 +/- 0.01 mmol/L, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A high-fat, low-carbohydrate intake reduces the ability of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production and alters the relation between oxidative and nonoxidative glucose disposal in a way that favors storage of glucose.
Authors: Marc-Andre Cornier; Dana Dabelea; Teri L Hernandez; Rachel C Lindstrom; Amy J Steig; Nicole R Stob; Rachael E Van Pelt; Hong Wang; Robert H Eckel Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Christopher C Webster; Timothy D Noakes; Shaji K Chacko; Jeroen Swart; Tertius A Kohn; James A H Smith Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Yoshihiro Kashiwaya; Robert Pawlosky; William Markis; M Todd King; Christian Bergman; Shireesh Srivastava; Andrew Murray; Kieran Clarke; Richard L Veech Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Anize D von Frankenberg; Anna Marina; Xiaoling Song; Holly S Callahan; Mario Kratz; Kristina M Utzschneider Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Esther Donga; Marieke van Dijk; J Gert van Dijk; Nienke R Biermasz; Gert-Jan Lammers; Klaas van Kralingen; Roel P L M Hoogma; Eleonora P M Corssmit; Johannes A Romijn Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Andrea Lee Estrada; William Max Hudson; Paul Y Kim; Claire Marie Stewart; Frederick F Peelor; Yuren Wei; Dong Wang; Karyn L Hamilton; Benjamin F Miller; Michael J Pagliassotti Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.310