OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that differential skeletal muscle involvement, previously observed in dogs with a homologue of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, correlates with the histochemical markers of myofiber injury and regeneration. DESIGN: Evidence of injury (cellular penetration by Evans blue dye, immunoglobulin G expression, hematoxylin and eosin staining of necrotic figures), myofiber regeneration (fetal myosin heavy chain isoform expression), and morphologic indices in the cranial sartorius (CS), long digital extensor, and vastus lateralis muscles were examined in five dogs with dystrophy and five normal dogs. RESULTS: Only the CS muscle, at 1 mo, demonstrated significant differences in injury when compared with age-matched controls. By 6 mo, the long digital extensor and vastus lateralis also suffered greater than normal injury. Only the dystrophic CS tissue expressed a notable increase in mean myofiber diameter when compared with other muscles at 6 mo. Normal CS muscles revealed a distinct population of small myofibers at this age. CONCLUSION: The CS seems unique in its selective pathologic involvement. These differences may contribute to the marked regenerative response of this muscle in the dystrophic state. An improved understanding of mechanisms by which some dystrophin-deficient canine muscles remain spared from injury may provide clues to investigate and prevent the degenerative processes in humans.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that differential skeletal muscle involvement, previously observed in dogs with a homologue of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, correlates with the histochemical markers of myofiber injury and regeneration. DESIGN: Evidence of injury (cellular penetration by Evans blue dye, immunoglobulin G expression, hematoxylin and eosin staining of necrotic figures), myofiber regeneration (fetal myosin heavy chain isoform expression), and morphologic indices in the cranial sartorius (CS), long digital extensor, and vastus lateralis muscles were examined in five dogs with dystrophy and five normal dogs. RESULTS: Only the CS muscle, at 1 mo, demonstrated significant differences in injury when compared with age-matched controls. By 6 mo, the long digital extensor and vastus lateralis also suffered greater than normal injury. Only the dystrophicCS tissue expressed a notable increase in mean myofiber diameter when compared with other muscles at 6 mo. Normal CS muscles revealed a distinct population of small myofibers at this age. CONCLUSION: The CS seems unique in its selective pathologic involvement. These differences may contribute to the marked regenerative response of this muscle in the dystrophic state. An improved understanding of mechanisms by which some dystrophin-deficient canine muscles remain spared from injury may provide clues to investigate and prevent the degenerative processes in humans.
Authors: Marianela Candolfi; Kurt M Kroeger; G Elizabeth Pluhar; Josee Bergeron; Mariana Puntel; James F Curtin; Elizabeth A McNiel; Andrew B Freese; John R Ohlfest; Peter Moore; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Joe N Kornegay; Janet R Bogan; Daniel J Bogan; Martin K Childers; Juan Li; Peter Nghiem; David A Detwiler; C Aaron Larsen; Robert W Grange; Ratna K Bhavaraju-Sanka; Sandra Tou; Bruce P Keene; James F Howard; Jiahui Wang; Zheng Fan; Scott J Schatzberg; Martin A Styner; Kevin M Flanigan; Xiao Xiao; Eric P Hoffman Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2012-01-05 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: Xuan Guan; David L Mack; Claudia M Moreno; Jennifer L Strande; Julie Mathieu; Yingai Shi; Chad D Markert; Zejing Wang; Guihua Liu; Michael W Lawlor; Emily C Moorefield; Tara N Jones; James A Fugate; Mark E Furth; Charles E Murry; Hannele Ruohola-Baker; Yuanyuan Zhang; Luis F Santana; Martin K Childers Journal: Stem Cell Res Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 2.020
Authors: Yongping Yue; Arkasubhra Ghosh; Chun Long; Brian Bostick; Bruce F Smith; Joe N Kornegay; Dongsheng Duan Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Peter P Nghiem; Eric P Hoffman; Priya Mittal; Kristy J Brown; Scott J Schatzberg; Svetlana Ghimbovschi; Zuyi Wang; Joe N Kornegay Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Marianela Candolfi; G Elizabeth Pluhar; Kurt Kroeger; Mariana Puntel; James Curtin; Carlos Barcia; A K M Ghulam Muhammad; Weidong Xiong; Chunyan Liu; Sonali Mondkar; William Kuoy; Terry Kang; Elizabeth A McNeil; Andrew B Freese; John R Ohlfest; Peter Moore; Donna Palmer; Phillip Ng; John D Young; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2007-05-23 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Martin K Childers; Janet R Bogan; Daniel J Bogan; Hansel Greiner; Melanie Holder; Robert W Grange; Joe N Kornegay Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 5.810