PURPOSE: Golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) is a widely used canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Recent studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to non-invasively detect consistent changes in both DMD and GRMD. In this paper, we propose a semiautomated system to quantify MRI biomarkers of GRMD. METHODS: Our system was applied to a database of 45 MRI scans from 8 normal and 10 GRMD dogs in a longitudinal natural history study. We first segmented six proximal pelvic limb muscles using a semiautomated full muscle segmentation method. We then performed preprocessing, including intensity inhomogeneity correction, spatial registration of different image sequences, intensity calibration of T2-weighted and T2-weighted fat-suppressed images, and calculation of MRI biomarker maps. Finally, for each of the segmented muscles, we automatically measured MRI biomarkers of muscle volume, intensity statistics over MRI biomarker maps, and statistical image texture features. RESULTS: The muscle volume and the mean intensities in T2 value, fat, and water maps showed group differences between normal and GRMD dogs. For the statistical texture biomarkers, both the histogram and run-length matrix features showed obvious group differences between normal and GRMD dogs. The full muscle segmentation showed significantly less error and variability in the proposed biomarkers when compared to the standard, limited muscle range segmentation. CONCLUSION: The experimental results demonstrated that this quantification tool could reliably quantify MRI biomarkers in GRMD dogs, suggesting that it would also be useful for quantifying disease progression and measuring therapeutic effect in DMD patients.
PURPOSE:Golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) is a widely used canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Recent studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to non-invasively detect consistent changes in both DMD and GRMD. In this paper, we propose a semiautomated system to quantify MRI biomarkers of GRMD. METHODS: Our system was applied to a database of 45 MRI scans from 8 normal and 10 GRMD dogs in a longitudinal natural history study. We first segmented six proximal pelvic limb muscles using a semiautomated full muscle segmentation method. We then performed preprocessing, including intensity inhomogeneity correction, spatial registration of different image sequences, intensity calibration of T2-weighted and T2-weighted fat-suppressed images, and calculation of MRI biomarker maps. Finally, for each of the segmented muscles, we automatically measured MRI biomarkers of muscle volume, intensity statistics over MRI biomarker maps, and statistical image texture features. RESULTS: The muscle volume and the mean intensities in T2 value, fat, and water maps showed group differences between normal and GRMD dogs. For the statistical texture biomarkers, both the histogram and run-length matrix features showed obvious group differences between normal and GRMD dogs. The full muscle segmentation showed significantly less error and variability in the proposed biomarkers when compared to the standard, limited muscle range segmentation. CONCLUSION: The experimental results demonstrated that this quantification tool could reliably quantify MRI biomarkers in GRMD dogs, suggesting that it would also be useful for quantifying disease progression and measuring therapeutic effect in DMDpatients.
Authors: Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: R G Miller; K R Sharma; G K Pavlath; E Gussoni; M Mynhier; A M Lanctot; C M Greco; L Steinman; H M Blau Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Joe N Kornegay; Diane D Cundiff; Daniel J Bogan; Janet R Bogan; Carol S Okamura Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Martin K Childers; Janet R Bogan; Daniel J Bogan; Hansel Greiner; Melanie Holder; Robert W Grange; Joe N Kornegay Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Pierre G Carlier; Benjamin Marty; Olivier Scheidegger; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Pierre-Yves Baudin; Eduard Snezhko; Dmitry Vlodavets Journal: J Neuromuscul Dis Date: 2016-03-03
Authors: Christopher J Moore; Melissa C Caughey; Diane O Meyer; Regina Emmett; Catherine Jacobs; Manisha Chopra; James F Howard; Caterina M Gallippi Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Beatriz Paniagua; Antonio Carlos Ruellas; Erika Benavides; Steve Marron; Larry Woldford; Lucia Cevidanes Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2015-03-17
Authors: Joe N Kornegay; Jennifer M Peterson; Daniel J Bogan; William Kline; Janet R Bogan; Jennifer L Dow; Zheng Fan; Jiahui Wang; Mihye Ahn; Hongtu Zhu; Martin Styner; Denis C Guttridge Journal: Skelet Muscle Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 4.912
Authors: Aurea B Martins-Bach; Jackeline Malheiros; Béatrice Matot; Poliana C M Martins; Camila F Almeida; Waldir Caldeira; Alberto F Ribeiro; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Noura Azzabou; Alberto Tannús; Pierre G Carlier; Mariz Vainzof Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joe N Kornegay; Daniel J Bogan; Janet R Bogan; Jennifer L Dow; Jiahui Wang; Zheng Fan; Naili Liu; Leigh C Warsing; Robert W Grange; Mihye Ahn; Cynthia J Balog-Alvarez; Steven W Cotten; Monte S Willis; Candice Brinkmeyer-Langford; Hongtu Zhu; Joe Palandra; Carl A Morris; Martin A Styner; Kathryn R Wagner Journal: Skelet Muscle Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 4.912