Literature DB >> 11236413

The impact of referral to a primary physician on cervical cancer screening.

J M Gill1, S A McClellan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether referral to a primary physician led to an increase in screening for cervical cancer among women enrolled in Delaware Medicaid.
METHODS: Medicaid claims data were used to compare annual Papanicolaou (Pap) test rates for women referred to a primary care physician or obstetrician (n = 365) with rates for age-matched comparison women who were not referred (n = 1799).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of referred women and 27% of comparison women underwent Pap tests (adjusted odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval = 1.33, 2.20).
CONCLUSIONS: Referral to a primary physician had a positive impact on cervical cancer screening among the study participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11236413      PMCID: PMC1446553          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.3.451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  23 in total

1.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

2.  Physician agreement with US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.

Authors:  K C Stange; R Kelly; J Chao; S J Zyzanski; J C Shank; C R Jaén; J Melnikow; S Flocke
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Medicaid and managed care.

Authors:  J K Iglehart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women.

Authors:  E E Calle; W D Flanders; M J Thun; L M Martin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Do Medicare patients with disabilities receive preventive services? A population-based study.

Authors:  L Chan; J N Doctor; R F MacLehose; H Lawson; R A Rosenblatt; L M Baldwin; A Jha
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Cancer screening by primary care physicians. Can we explain the differences?

Authors:  E H Osborn; J A Bird; S J McPhee; J E Rodnick; D Fordham
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use.

Authors:  J E Sisk; S A Gorman; A L Reisinger; S A Glied; W H DuMouchel; M M Hynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-07-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter?

Authors:  N Lurie; J Slater; P McGovern; J Ekstrum; L Quam; K Margolis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.

Authors:  S J Katz; T P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The effects of having a regular doctor on access to primary care.

Authors:  J M Lambrew; G H DeFriese; T S Carey; T C Ricketts; A K Biddle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.