Literature DB >> 11235454

Conducting a systematic review.

T Jones1, D Evans.   

Abstract

In response to the growing volume of health care literature and the variable quality of reported studies, systematic reviews have increasingly been used to guide health care decisions because of their rigorous summary of the research. Systematic reviews utilise planned methods of identifying, appraising, then summarising the results from individual studies. The steps in performing a systematic review include: preparing a detailed research protocol; selecting criteria for inclusion of articles in the review; systematically searching the published and unpublished literature; determining which articles meet the predefined inclusion criteria; critically appraising the quality of the research; extracting outcome data from the research report and statistically combining data, where appropriate, in order to summarise the best available evidence on the topic of interest. These processes are documented in the systematic review report, and can be subject to peer review and critique like other research.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11235454     DOI: 10.1016/s1036-7314(00)70624-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Crit Care        ISSN: 1036-7314            Impact factor:   2.737


  9 in total

1.  Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Ou; Yusi Hua; Jin Liu; Cansheng Gong; Wenling Zhao
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Thoracic spine pain in the general population: prevalence, incidence and associated factors in children, adolescents and adults. A systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Anne J Smith; Leon M Straker; Peter Bragge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas.

Authors:  Peter Bragge; Ornella Clavisi; Tari Turner; Emma Tavender; Alex Collie; Russell L Gruen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Evidence map of prevention and treatment interventions for depression in young people.

Authors:  Patrick Callahan; Ping Liu; Rosemary Purcell; Alexandra G Parker; Sarah E Hetrick
Journal:  Depress Res Treat       Date:  2012-03-15

5.  Calcineurin inhibitors may be a reasonable alternative to cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment of active lupus nephritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Yang; Min Li; Wei He; Bin Wang; Yong Gu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.

Authors:  Persis Katrak; Andrea E Bialocerkowski; Nicola Massy-Westropp; Saravana Kumar; Karen A Grimmer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  School based interventions versus family based interventions in the treatment of childhood obesity- a systematic review.

Authors:  Saravana Kumar Kothandan
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2014-01-29

8.  Barriers and facilitators of rendering HIV services by community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-synthesis protocol.

Authors:  Gugulethu Eve Khumalo; Elizabeth Lutge; Praba Naidoo; Tivani Phosa Mashamba-Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Barriers and facilitators of rendering HIV services by community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Gugulethu Eve Khumalo; Elizabeth E Lutge; Praba Naidoo; Tivani Phosa Mashamba-Thompson
Journal:  Fam Med Community Health       Date:  2021-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.