Literature DB >> 11233908

Biophysical characteristics of anti-Gal(alpha)1-3Gal IgM binding to cell surfaces: implications for xenotransplantation.

W Parker1, K B Stitzenberg, P B Yu, V S Pratt, Y C Nakamura, L S Farel, C M Ward, S S Lin, M L Everett, J L Platt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Natural antibodies directed against cell surface carbohydrates are thought to be vital to host defense and to initiate the rejection of xenografts and ABO-incompatible allografts. The biophysical properties underlying the association and dissociation of these antibodies from cell surfaces is incompletely understood. We investigated those properties for the binding of Galalpha1-3Gal antibodies to porcine endothelial cell surfaces, because such interactions might be relevant to the clinical application of xenotransplantation. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The initial rate of binding of anti-Galalpha1-3Gal antibodies to endothelial cells was found to depend on antibody concentration, antibody diffusion, and antigen concentration. The presence of an intact glycocalyx had a greater impact on antibody binding than mobility of antigen in cell membranes. Disruption of glycocalyx increased the amount of antibody bound at equilibrium by more than 50%. Although the binding of anti-Galalpha1-3Gal antibodies to cell surfaces could be inhibited by soluble Galalpha1-3Gal, once bound, some anti-Galalpha1-3Gal could not be dissociated by competitive inhibitors of binding or by denaturation of the bound Ig with chaotropic reagents, but could be dissociated by reduction of disulfide bonds, suggesting that attachment to cell surfaces was, at least in part, by means other than specific reaction with the epitope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11233908     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200102150-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Accommodation of grafts: implications for health and disease.

Authors:  Amy H Tang; Jeffrey L Platt
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.850

Review 2.  Novel functions of B cells in transplantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Platt; Shoichiro Tsuji; Marilia Cascalho
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 3.  Noncognate function of B cells in transplantation.

Authors:  Samuel J Balin; Jeffrey L Platt; Marilia Cascalho
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.782

4.  Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Jolene E Valentin; Ann M Stewart-Akers; George P McCabe; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Cryptic B cell response to renal transplantation.

Authors:  R J Lynch; I A Silva; B J Chen; J D Punch; M Cascalho; J L Platt
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Altered functionality of anti-bacterial antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

Authors:  Anne Lamontagne; Ronald E Long; Mary Ann Comunale; Julie Hafner; Lucy Rodemich-Betesh; Mengjun Wang; Jorge Marrero; Adrian M Di Bisceglie; Timothy Block; Anand Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.