Literature DB >> 11233837

Aspects of MR image distortions in radiotherapy treatment planning.

A Fransson1, P Andreo, R Pötter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Registration of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images are commonly performed to define the different target regions used in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTTP). The accuracy of target definition will then depend on the spatial accuracy of the CT and MR data, and on the technique used to register the images. CT images are usually regarded as geometrically correct, while MR images are known to suffer from geometric distortion. The aim of this paper is to discuss the possible impact of MR image distortions in the radiotherapy treatment planning process.
METHODS: The origin, magnitude, and relative impact of the different sources of geometric distortions that affect the MR image data at different magnetic fields and for different acquisition settings are described. Techniques for distortion correction are reviewed, and their limitations are outlined. The sensitivity of image registration techniques to the presence of geometric distortions in the MR data is discussed. Finally, an overview of image registration techniques used and results obtained in clinical radiotherapy treatment planning applications is given.
RESULTS: Spatial distortions in MR images vary with field strength and with the image acquisition protocol. The spatial accuracy generally decreases with distance from the magnet isocenter. Distortion correction techniques based on phantom evaluations cannot adequately model patient-induced distortions.
CONCLUSION: Image protocols with high gradient bandwidths should be used to reduce the spatial distortions in MR images. Correction techniques based only on phantom measurements could be sufficient at low magnetic fields, while at higher fields additional corrections of patient-related distortions might be needed. Registration techniques based on matching of Landmark points located far from the magnet isocenter are especially prone to MR distortions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11233837     DOI: 10.1007/pl00002385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  20 in total

1.  Definition of the CTV prostate in CT and MRI by using CT-MRI image fusion in IMRT planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Hentschel; Wolfgang Oehler; Dirk Strauss; Andreas Ulrich; Ansgar Malich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Review of strategies for MRI based reconstruction of endocavitary and interstitial applicators in brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  José Richart; Vicente Carmona-Meseguer; Teresa García-Martínez; Antonio Herreros; Antonio Otal; Santiago Pellejero; Ana Tornero-López; José Pérez-Calatayud
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-23

3.  The influence of MRI scan position on image registration accuracy, target delineation and calculated dose in prostatic radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Hanvey; A H Sadozye; M McJury; M Glegg; J Foster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Penile bulb sparing in prostate cancer radiotherapy : Dose analysis of an in-house MRI system to improve contouring.

Authors:  F Böckelmann; M Hammon; S Lettmaier; R Fietkau; C Bert; F Putz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Technical Note: Characterization and correction of gradient nonlinearity induced distortion on a 1.0 T open bore MR-SIM.

Authors:  Ryan G Price; Mo Kadbi; Joshua Kim; James Balter; Indrin J Chetty; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Distortion correction in whole-body imaging of live mice using a 1-Tesla compact magnetic resonance imaging system.

Authors:  Shigeru Kiryu; Yusuke Inoue; Yoshitaka Masutani; Tomoyuki Haishi; Kohki Yoshikawa; Makoto Watanabe; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; Nathan S White; Gwe-Ya Kim; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Roshan Karunamuni; Deborah Marshall; Dominic Holland; Parag Sanghvi; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; Anders M Dale; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01

8.  Accelerated atrophy of lower leg and foot muscles--a follow-up study of long-term diabetic polyneuropathy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  C S Andreassen; J Jakobsen; S Ringgaard; N Ejskjaer; H Andersen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Commissioning of a new wide-bore MRI scanner for radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  G P Liney; S C Owen; A K E Beaumont; V R Lazar; D J Manton; A W Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  [Treatment planning with functional MRI].

Authors:  P Georg; P Andrzejewski; K Pinker; D Georg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.