Literature DB >> 11233584

Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.

G Baron1, P De Wals, F Milord.   

Abstract

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a lottery on physicians' responses to a mail survey, a randomized controlled trial was conducted with a random sample of 1,000 members of the Quebec Federation of General Practitioners in 1997. For the first mailing of this survey, each respondent was randomly assigned to the control or experimental group, which was offered participation in a lottery upon return of the questionnaire. Response rate was 41.2% in the experimental group and 34.8% in the control group, a 6.4% difference (CI95%: 0.6%-12.6%). The additional cost of the lottery was about Can$500, giving an incremental cost of Can$16 per questionnaire returned. In conclusion, a lottery resulted in a small but statistically significant increase in the response rate of physicians to a mail survey. This method may be a cost-effective option when applied to large surveys.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11233584     DOI: 10.1177/01632780122034777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  12 in total

1.  Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Rachel Kohn; Aaron Dornbrand-Lo; Thomas Metkus; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Medical end-of-life practices among Canadian physicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Isabelle Marcoux; Antoine Boivin; Laura Mesana; Ian D Graham; Paul Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-05-05

3.  Psychoeducation in schizophrenia--results of a survey of all psychiatric institutions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Authors:  Christine Rummel-Kluge; Gabriele Pitschel-Walz; Josef Bäuml; Werner Kissling
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.

Authors:  Inese Grava-Gubins; Sarah Scott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey.

Authors:  Y Martins; R I Lederman; C L Lowenstein; S Joffe; B A Neville; B T Hastings; G A Abel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors.

Authors:  Anthony Scott; Sung-Hee Jeon; Catherine M Joyce; John S Humphreys; Guyonne Kalb; Julia Witt; Anne Leahy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys [ISRCTN32203485].

Authors:  L M Roberts; S Wilson; A Roalfe; P Bridge
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

9.  Frequency and relevance of psychoeducation in psychiatric diagnoses: results of two surveys five years apart in German-speaking European countries.

Authors:  Christine Rummel-Kluge; Michael Kluge; Werner Kissling
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Factors influencing the participation of gastroenterologists and hepatologists in clinical research.

Authors:  Anouk T Dev; Teresa L Kauf; Amany Zekry; Keyur Patel; Karen Heller; Kevin A Schulman; John G McHutchison
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.