Literature DB >> 11231765

Increased corneal thickness in patients with ocular hypertension.

D C Herman1, D O Hodge, W M Bourne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central corneal thickness greater than 0.520 mm causes true intraocular pressure to be overestimated when the technique of applanation tonometry is used to measure intraocular pressure.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the corneal thickness measurements of patients enrolled in a study of ocular hypertension with those of age-matched control subjects with normal intraocular pressure.
METHODS: Central corneal pachymetry using an optical pachymeter was performed on each study subject (n = 55) at baseline and in an independent sample of control subjects. A 2 sample, 2-tailed T test was used to compare the 2 populations.
RESULTS: The patients with ocular hypertension had significantly higher mean corneal thickness measurements (mean +/- SD, 0.594 +/- 0.037 mm) than the control group (0.563 +/- 0.027 mm) (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Corneal thickness may be a confounding factor in the measurement of intraocular pressure, and this may modify the risk for progression to glaucoma in patients with ocular hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11231765     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.3.334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  16 in total

1.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

Authors:  S Miglior; E Albe; M Guareschi; G Mandelli; S Gomarasca; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  [The risk of glaucoma and corneal thickness].

Authors:  A G Böhm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Comparative measurements of central corneal thickness with two ultrasound pachymeters].

Authors:  E Schmidt; K Schwanitz; A G Böhm; L E Pillunat
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The biometric study in different stages of primary angle-closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Y-Y Chen; Y-Y Chen; S-J Sheu; P Chou
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Circadian variations in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  P Fogagnolo; L Rossetti; F Mazzolani; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  A structural model for the in vivo human cornea including collagen-swelling interaction.

Authors:  Xi Cheng; Steven J Petsche; Peter M Pinsky
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Josephine Wachtl; Marc Töteberg-Harms; Sonja Frimmel; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  New nonlinear multivariable model shows the relationship between central corneal thickness and HRTII topographic parameters in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kourkoutas; Gerasimos Georgopoulos; Antonios Maragos; Ioannis Apostolakis; George Tsekouras; Irene S Karanasiou; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Evaggelos Iliakis; Michael Moschos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02

9.  Central corneal thickness in black Cameroonian ocular hypertensive and glaucomatous subjects.

Authors:  Christelle Domngang Noche; André Omgbwa Eballe; Assumpta Lucienne Bella
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-24

10.  Relationship between central corneal thickness and visual field defect in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Wenzhong Lin; Yumiko Aoyama; Kazuhide Kawase; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.