Literature DB >> 11230903

Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus).

J B. Kjaer1, P Sørensen, G Su.   

Abstract

A selection experiment was initiated in 1996 in which selection for (HP line) and against (LP line) feather pecking was performed. The foundation stock was a White Leghorn layer strain established in 1970 and maintained since then as a random bred control line at the Institute. Six hatches were produced over three generations. At the age of 68 weeks (generation 0, 1996), 35 weeks (generation 1, 1997), 30 weeks (generation 2, 1998), and 27 weeks (generation 3, 1999) female birds were transferred to observation pens and their feather pecking behaviour was recorded. In each generation, 30 females and 8 males were selected from approximately 200 females and 60 males. The selection criterion was breeding value estimated by animal model on the trait 'number of bouts of feather pecking per bird per hour'.Feather pecking behaviour in adult hens was significantly higher in HP than in LP. In generation 2 the following was recorded: 3.10 versus 1.37 bouts per bird per hour (P<0.01), 7.04 versus 3.58 pecks per bird per hour (P<0.05) and the proportion of hens recorded feather pecking in the 180min observation period was 67 versus 56% (P<0.05). In generation 3 the following was recorded: 4.56 versus 0.63 bouts per bird per hour (P<0.001), 13.9 versus 2.51 pecks per bird per hour (P<0.001) and the proportion of hens recorded feather pecking in the 180min observation period was 75 versus 49% (P<0.001).In generation 3, plumage condition was better in LP on neck, breast, back, wings and tail, as well as overall (P<0.001). Body weight did not differ between lines in generation 2, but in generation 3, HP hens were on average heavier than LP hens at the age of 27 weeks (1435g versus 1371g, P<0.001).

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11230903     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00184-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  31 in total

1.  Differences in gut microbiota composition of laying hen lines divergently selected on feather pecking.

Authors:  Jerine A J van der Eijk; Hugo de Vries; Joergen B Kjaer; Marc Naguib; Bas Kemp; Hauke Smidt; T Bas Rodenburg; Aart Lammers
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Identification of chromosomal locations associated with tail biting and being a victim of tail-biting behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Kaitlin Wilson; Ricardo Zanella; Carlos Ventura; Hanne Lind Johansen; Tore Framstad; Andrew Janczak; Adroaldo J Zanella; Holly Louise Neibergs
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pecking Behavior in Conventional Layer Hybrids and Dual-Purpose Hens Throughout the Laying Period.

Authors:  Lorena Rieke; Birgit Spindler; Isabel Zylka; Nicole Kemper; Mona Franziska Giersberg
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-23

4.  Across-line SNP association study for (innate) immune and behavioral traits in laying hens.

Authors:  Jan J van der Poel; Filippo Biscarini; Bas T Rodenburg; Johan Am van Arendonk; Henk K Parmentier; Annemieke P Jungerius; Henk Bovenhuis
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2011-06-03

Review 5.  The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock.

Authors:  Esther D Ellen; T Bas Rodenburg; Gerard A A Albers; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Irene Camerlink; Naomi Duijvesteijn; Egbert F Knol; William M Muir; Katrijn Peeters; Inonge Reimert; Ewa Sell-Kubiak; Johan A M van Arendonk; Jeroen Visscher; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations.

Authors:  William M Muir; Heng-Wei Cheng; Candace Croney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Differentially expressed genes for aggressive pecking behaviour in laying hens.

Authors:  Bart Buitenhuis; Jakob Hedegaard; Luc Janss; Peter Sørensen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Genetic parameters and signatures of selection in two divergent laying hen lines selected for feather pecking behaviour.

Authors:  Vanessa Grams; Robin Wellmann; Siegfried Preuß; Michael A Grashorn; Jörgen B Kjaer; Werner Bessei; Jörn Bennewitz
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Evidence of phenotypic and genetic relationships between sociality, emotional reactivity and production traits in Japanese quail.

Authors:  Julien Recoquillay; Christine Leterrier; Ludovic Calandreau; Aline Bertin; Frédérique Pitel; David Gourichon; Alain Vignal; Catherine Beaumont; Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval; Cécile Arnould
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Plumage condition in laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and indirect effects in two purebred layer lines.

Authors:  Tessa Brinker; Piter Bijma; Jeroen Visscher; T Bas Rodenburg; Esther D Ellen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.