Literature DB >> 11229895

Different mechanisms of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in the indianmeal moth.

S Herrero1, B Oppert, J Ferré.   

Abstract

Susceptibility to protoxin and toxin forms of Cry1Ab and the binding of (125)I-labeled Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac has been examined in three Plodia interpunctella colonies, one susceptible (688(s)) and two resistant (198(r) and Dpl(r)) to Bacillus thuringiensis. Toxicological studies showed that the 198(r) colony was 11-fold more resistant to Cry1Ab protoxin than to Cry1Ab activated toxin, whereas the Dpl(r) colony was 4-fold more resistant to protoxin versus toxin. Binding results with (125)I-labeled toxins indicated the occurrence of two different binding sites for Cry1Ab in the susceptible insects, one of them shared with Cry1Ac. Cry1Ab binding was found to be altered in insects from both resistant colonies, though in different ways. Compared with the susceptible colony, insects from the Dpl(r) colony showed a drastic reduction in binding affinity (60-fold higher K(d)), although they had similar concentrations of binding sites. Insects from the 198(r) colony showed a slight reduction in both binding affinity and binding site concentration (five-fold-higher K(d) and ca. three-fold-lower R(t) compared with the 688(s) colony). No major difference in Cry1Ac binding was found among the three colonies. The fact that the 198(r) colony also has a protease-mediated mechanism of resistance (B. Oppert, R. Hammel, J. E. Throne, and K. J. Kramer, J. Biol. Chem. 272:23473-23476, 1997) is in agreement with our toxicological data in which this colony has a different susceptibility to the protoxin and toxin forms of Cry1Ab. It is noteworthy that the three colonies used in this work derived originally from ca. 100 insects, which reflects the high variability and high frequency of B. thuringiensis resistance genes occurring in natural populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11229895      PMCID: PMC92698          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.3.1085-1089.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  15 in total

1.  Global variation in the genetic and biochemical basis of diamondback moth resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  B E Tabashnik; Y B Liu; T Malvar; D G Heckel; L Masson; V Ballester; F Granero; J L Ménsua; J Ferré
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems.

Authors:  P J Munson; D Rodbard
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1980-09-01       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Integrative model for binding of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in susceptible and resistant larvae of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella).

Authors:  V Ballester; F Granero; B E Tabashnik; T Malvar; J Ferré
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Initial frequency of alleles for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in field populations of Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  F Gould; A Anderson; A Jones; D Sumerford; D G Heckel; J Lopez; S Micinski; R Leonard; M Laster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Importance of specific receptors on the brush border membrane of the mid-gut of target insects.

Authors:  J Van Rie; S Jansens; H Höfte; D Degheele; H Van Mellaert
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1989-12-08

6.  Broad-spectrum resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  F Gould; A Martinez-Ramirez; A Anderson; J Ferre; F J Silva; W J Moar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins.

Authors:  E Schnepf; N Crickmore; J Van Rie; D Lereclus; J Baum; J Feitelson; D R Zeigler; D H Dean
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  A Change in a Single Midgut Receptor in the Diamondback Moth (Plutella xylostella) Is Only in Part Responsible for Field Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis subsp. aizawai.

Authors:  D J Wright; M Iqbal; F Granero; J Ferre
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Mechanism of insect resistance to the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  J Van Rie; W H McGaughey; D E Johnson; B D Barnett; H Van Mellaert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Altered protoxin activation by midgut enzymes from a Bacillus thuringiensis resistant strain of Plodia interpunctella.

Authors:  B Oppert; K J Kramer; D E Johnson; S C MacIntosh; W H McGaughey
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1994-02-15       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  24 in total

1.  High genetic variability for resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in a single population of diamondback moth.

Authors:  J González-Cabrera; S Herrero; J Ferré
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Characterization of Insecticidal Genes of Bacillus thuringiensis Strains Isolated from Arid Environments.

Authors:  Hussein H Abulreesh; Gamal E H Osman; Abdulrahman S A Assaeedi
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Common, but complex, mode of resistance of Plutella xylostella to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac.

Authors:  Ali H Sayyed; Roxani Gatsi; M Sales Ibiza-Palacios; Baltasar Escriche; Denis J Wright; Neil Crickmore
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Use of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins for control of the cotton pest Earias insulana (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  María A Ibargutxi; Anna Estela; Juan Ferré; Primitivo Caballero
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin-binding and pore-forming activity in brush border membrane vesicles prepared from anterior and posterior midgut regions of lepidopteran larvae.

Authors:  Ana Rodrigo-Simón; Silvia Caccia; Juan Ferré
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Shared binding sites in Lepidoptera for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ja and Cry1A toxins.

Authors:  S Herrero; J González-Cabrera; B E Tabashnik; J Ferré
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Genetic and biochemical characterization of field-evolved resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella.

Authors:  Ali H Sayyed; Ben Raymond; M Sales Ibiza-Palacios; Baltasar Escriche; Denis J Wright
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Induction and transmission of Bacillus thuringiensis tolerance in the flour moth Ephestia kuehniella.

Authors:  M Mahbubur Rahman; Harry L S Roberts; Muhammad Sarjan; Sassan Asgari; Otto Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Binding site alteration is responsible for field-isolated resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2A insecticidal proteins in two Helicoverpa species.

Authors:  Silvia Caccia; Carmen Sara Hernández-Rodríguez; Rod J Mahon; Sharon Downes; William James; Nadine Bautsoens; Jeroen Van Rie; Juan Ferré
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Expressed sequence tags from larval gut of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis): exploring candidate genes potentially involved in Bacillus thuringiensis toxicity and resistance.

Authors:  Chitvan Khajuria; Yu Cheng Zhu; Ming-Shun Chen; Lawrent L Buschman; Randall A Higgins; Jianxiu Yao; Andre Lb Crespo; Blair D Siegfried; Subbaratnam Muthukrishnan; Kun Yan Zhu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.