Literature DB >> 11226944

Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients.

W M Luxford1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11226944     DOI： 10.1067/mhn.2001.113035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN： 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


× No keyword cloud information.
  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of TIMIT sentence list equivalency with adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Sarah E King; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Laura K Holden; Michael Strube
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; H Richard Droghini; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Prediction of cochlear implant performance by genetic mutation: the spiral ganglion hypothesis.

Authors:  Robert W Eppsteiner; A Eliot Shearer; Michael S Hildebrand; Adam P Deluca; Haihong Ji; Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Black-Ziegelbein; Thomas L Casavant; Terry A Braun; Todd E Scheetz; Steven E Scherer; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly.

Authors:  W Di Nardo; R Anzivino; S Giannantonio; L Schinaia; G Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; Harris Richard Droghini; Craig A Velozo; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Kathleen F Faulkner; Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  The effect of technology and testing environment on speech perception using telehealth with cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Daniel L Valente; Ryan W McCreery; Gina R Diaz; Todd Sanford; Roger Harpster
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Richard K Gurgel; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.

Authors:  Robert Kang; Grace Liu Nimmons; Ward Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Kaibao Nie; Jong Ho Won; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.