H M Hasselhorn1, T Theorell, E Vingård. 1. Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Wuppertal, Germany. hans-martin.hasselhorn@arbmed.uni-wuppertal.de
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognosis of spine disease by investigating biologic parameters reflecting different physiologic or psychophysiological systems in men and women with acute onset of low back or neck/shoulder complaints. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Psychosocial factors may be of importance to the etiology and prognosis of musculoskeletal disorders. The possible mechanisms, however, remain unclear. Stress-induced long-lasting energy mobilization resulting in inhibited anabolism has been discussed. Using a theoretical framework within stress physiology, such psychophysiological processes were recorded by measures of substances representing the anabolic, catabolic, immunologic, and opioid systems. METHODS: The study comprised 67 working men and women 21 to 59 years of age seeking care by any caregiver for acute low back and/or neck/shoulder pain. Blood samples were taken and analyzed for 3 methyl 5hydroxy phenylethylene glycol (MHPG, reflecting sympathoadrenomedullary activity), DHEA-s (anabolism), immunoglobulin E, interleukin 6 (immune activity), and beta-endorphin (pain regulation). The participants were followed up for 6 months after the blood samples had been drawn. RESULTS: In women, low MHPG, low DHEA-s, and low beta-endorphin predicted persistent disability due to low back complaints. Few significant findings were made for self-reported pain, for neck/shoulder complaints, and for men. CONCLUSION: Disturbances of the regulation of certain biologic parameters might be indicators of a prolonged course of low back disease in women. Prospective studies are necessary to enable causal conclusions.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognosis of spine disease by investigating biologic parameters reflecting different physiologic or psychophysiological systems in men and women with acute onset of low back or neck/shoulder complaints. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Psychosocial factors may be of importance to the etiology and prognosis of musculoskeletal disorders. The possible mechanisms, however, remain unclear. Stress-induced long-lasting energy mobilization resulting in inhibited anabolism has been discussed. Using a theoretical framework within stress physiology, such psychophysiological processes were recorded by measures of substances representing the anabolic, catabolic, immunologic, and opioid systems. METHODS: The study comprised 67 working men and women 21 to 59 years of age seeking care by any caregiver for acute low back and/or neck/shoulder pain. Blood samples were taken and analyzed for 3 methyl 5hydroxy phenylethylene glycol (MHPG, reflecting sympathoadrenomedullary activity), DHEA-s (anabolism), immunoglobulin E, interleukin 6 (immune activity), and beta-endorphin (pain regulation). The participants were followed up for 6 months after the blood samples had been drawn. RESULTS: In women, low MHPG, low DHEA-s, and low beta-endorphin predicted persistent disability due to low back complaints. Few significant findings were made for self-reported pain, for neck/shoulder complaints, and for men. CONCLUSION: Disturbances of the regulation of certain biologic parameters might be indicators of a prolonged course of low back disease in women. Prospective studies are necessary to enable causal conclusions.
Authors: Anna-Karin Lennartsson; Töres Theorell; Alan L Rockwood; Mark M Kushnir; Ingibjörg H Jonsdottir Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shaiane Silva Tomazoni; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Jon Joensen; Martin Bjørn Stausholm; Ingvill Fjell Naterstad; Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal-Junior; Jan Magnus Bjordal Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Kimberly T Sibille; Ólöf A Steingrímsdóttir; Roger B Fillingim; Audun Stubhaug; Henrik Schirmer; Huaihou Chen; Bruce S McEwen; Christopher S Nielsen Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 3.037