Literature DB >> 11224823

Effects of shoe sole construction on skeletal motion during running.

A Stacoff1, C Reinschmidt, B M Nigg, A J Van Den Bogert, A Lundberg, J Denoth, E Stüssi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify effects of shoe sole modification on skeletal kinematics of the calcaneus and tibia during the stance phase of running.
METHODS: Intracortical bone pins with reflective marker triads were inserted under standard local anesthetic into the calcaneus and tibia of five healthy male subjects. The three-dimensional tibiocalcaneal rotations were determined using a joint coordinate system approach. Three shoe sole modifications were tested with different sole geometry: a lateral heel flare of 25 degrees (flared), no flare 0 degrees (straight), and a rounded sole.
RESULTS: The results showed that these shoe sole modifications did not change tibiocalcaneal rotations substantially. The shoe sole effects at the bone level were small and unsystematic (mean effects being less than 1 degrees ) compared with the differences between the subjects (up to 7 degrees ). Shoe eversion measured simultaneously with shoe markers showed no systematic shoe sole effects. A comparison of shoe and bone results showed the total shoe eversion and maximum shoe eversion velocity to be approximately twice as large as the respective measurements based on bone markers (correlations being r = 0.79 for maximum eversion velocity; r = 0.88 for total eversion), indicating that there may be a relationship or coupling effect between the shoes and the bone.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the tibiocalcaneal kinematics of running may be individually unique and that shoe sole modifications may not be able to change them substantially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224823     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200102000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.

Authors:  Xiaole Sun; Wing-Kai Lam; Xini Zhang; Junqing Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Stress fracture risk factors in female football players and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Mark W Creaby; Adam L Bryant; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Association of footwear with patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners.

Authors:  Roy T H Cheung; Gabriel Y F Ng; Bob F C Chen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Changes in talocrural and subtalar joint kinematics of barefoot versus shod forefoot landing.

Authors:  Mako Fukano; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  The effect of external ankle support on the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during a side step cutting task in netballers.

Authors:  Andrew John Greene; Max Christian Stuelcken; Richard Murray Smith; Benedicte Vanwanseele
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-12-22

6.  Effects of different medial arch support heights on rearfoot kinematics.

Authors:  Gunnar Wahmkow; Michael Cassel; Frank Mayer; Heiner Baur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of energy expenditure and substrate metabolism during overground and motorized treadmill running in Chinese middle-aged women.

Authors:  Shuo Li; Jing-Jing Xue; Ping Hong; Chao Song; Zi-Hong He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.